My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-10-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-10-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 3:21:48 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 2:45:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/27/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
meeting packet. Scott Anderson answered to be safe committee members should <br />try to not send emails to each however if an email discussion does happen it <br />should be routed through the contact person to add it to the packet to be discussed <br />in the public meeting. <br />Member Stenlund asked about the situation where the committee conducts part of <br />the regular meeting at a project site. Scott Anderson answered that a committee <br />can announce in the agenda of a meeting that they will be going to a site to do a <br />viewing of the site at a certain time and place. This indicates where the <br />committee will be and the public is welcome to join them. <br />Member Stenlund asked what the committee should do if the site is a closed site <br />to the public. Scott Anderson answered the City would deal with the person from <br />the public that demands access with the Board when this problem happens. <br />b. 2010 Budget Update <br />Duane Schwartz stated the City went with a different approach to the 2010 <br />Budget process this year called Budgeting for Outcomes. The City hired with a <br />financial consultant to help work through a program cost analysis for the tax <br />supported programs in the City. The City Council will be asked to prioritize the <br />tax supported programs to fit the set revenue program by the first week of <br />December. <br />Duane Schwartz mentioned this report depicts how the 2009 budget was spent on <br />the costs of programs and services. Earlier in the summer the Public Works <br />department submitted a report that stated in order for the department to continue <br />the same level of street maintenance it would need a 30% increase in 2010: <br />Duane Schwartz stated the City Council did set the preliminary tax levy on <br />September 14 not to exceed 9%. Salary and benefit increases will be at or about <br />zero for 2010. <br />Member DeBenedet asked if the 9% tax levy was a dollar amount. Duane <br />Schwartz answered it would translate into a dollar amount when the budget is <br />approved. <br />Member DeBenedet stated good roads cost less to maintain and asked if the <br />Public Works department is saving money now to spend on street maintenance in <br />the future. Duane Schwartz answered we are but that money is not being added to <br />the street infrastructure fund. <br />Member Vanderwall asked if the City Council has this information about street <br />maintenance when they are making decisions about the budget or does the Public <br />Works Environment and Transportation Committee need. to give the City Council <br />this information again. Duane Schwartz answered he does not know what the <br />City Council will need for input. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.