My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-11-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-11-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 3:36:49 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 2:49:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/24/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville PWET Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 8 ~ October 27, 2009 <br />others based on their understanding of the importance of water quality and their <br />visual example for easy compliance. Member Felice opined that, if this started as <br />an educational process, with them seeking permits to hold the car washes, it could <br />become common practice after 2-3 years. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted that this was a good question for the City Attorney, whether <br />educational or permitted activities were included; how to distinguish one from the <br />other; and how to define by the number of vehicles. <br />It was the consensus of members that most residents wanted to do the right thing, <br />but may be unaware of the impacts to water quality of their personal or individual <br />actions and activities. <br />Additional discussion included the compliance of mobile washing trucks; <br />compliance needed for carpet cleaning businesses with tanks on their trucks; <br />whether community-based groups, earning money, should be exempted if they <br />could prove that they had a process in place to manage suds, and had sought a <br />variance or permit from the City to wash cars in a community space; and <br />clarification that it was not illegal to wash a car, only to discharge the water into <br />the sanitary stormsewer system to educate people that they needed to implement a <br />system in washing cars to keep. the water from entering the sanitary system. <br />Page 3, Section H, General Provisions <br />Add an additional exemption:... unless the discharge conforms with the approved <br />City of Roseville Plan to manage. it. OR ... community-based organizations <br />proposing car washes, or other similar activity, shall submit an action plan to the <br />Public Works Director. <br />Add to #5 ... car washes, or including but not limited to carwashes; to include <br />washing siding (i.e., Lead paint); service-groups; non-commercial entities; <br />community ~:roups... <br />scussion included how the educational materials and fact sheet could <br />iential infiltration systems (addressed in Section I?); with staff <br />the PWET Commission to provide additional to the City Council for <br />on plain or stormwater system prevention plan. <br />Further discussion of Section H included providing for any machine or equipment <br />cleaning, including equipment, cars, or vehicles, confined to pervious areas. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that she would review other language for consistency. <br />Further discussion included clarifying that on the industrial side, no chemicals <br />could be exposed to the stormwater system at all (addressed under Section I - <br />industrial swift?); ensuring that Section H or I included references to unused oil, <br />used motor oil, chemicals or fertilizer and their storage containment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.