Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville PWET Conunission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 7 ~ October 27, 2009 <br />Paved Areas (driveways) <br />Washing <br />Car Washing <br />Impervious Surfaces <br />Pervious Surfaces <br />Page 2, Section D, Administration <br />Discussion included how the City was set up to administer implementation and <br />enforcement; defining which department is the umbrella department, based on <br />standard ordinance language; and intent that the City as an organization is <br />responsible. <br />Page 5, Section L, Notification of Spills <br />Noting cooperation and coordination of City <br />noticed for resolution. <br />Discussion included recognizing how e~ <br />paint into storm basins from private pr <br />them all public obligations for reportable <br />Further discussion included Page 3, Section E, <br />Sections F, G, and H, specifically addressing pools. <br />Member Stenlund opined that a <br />Management Practice and Guidar <br />them to be <br />oil, or washing concrete or <br />gal and damaging, making <br />in addition to <br />to Roseville's Best <br />Additional discussion included permit application requirements for standards on <br />treatment of soapy water before it enters the sewer system by youth car wash <br />groups, based on an action plan, application for a permit, and treatment prior to <br />entering regional ponds, or performing it on grass or plastic pads; permitted or <br />non-permitted activities and how they would be defined as related to oversight of <br />the City's MS4; how to make it enforceable and how to differentiate specific <br />activities; and the lack of enforcement by the City to-date of their erosion control <br />permits and how to ensure that this will be more enforceable and better <br />monitored; and making it easy for residents to comply with action plans without <br />exceeding government interference, based on the tools provided to them by the <br />City. <br />Further discussion included sample scenarios of the difficulty of enforcement by <br />staff when they are alerted to anon-compliant activity by phone, with the activity <br />no longer evidenced when staff is able to respond; educational information for <br />suspected violations based on present practice, based on a "carrot" rather than a <br />"stick," when a situation is no longer legally enforceable. <br />Member Felice suggested the need to educate groups (i.e., Boy Scouts or other <br />youth groups doing car wash fundraisers), who could in turn serve as examples to <br />