Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville PWE"I' Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 10 ~- October 27, 2009 <br />Chair DeBenedet noted a recent editorial in the Star Tribune newspaper <br />referencing the MPCA Organized Collection Report study and findings, providing <br />interesting information similar to that being discussed by the PWET Commission <br />to-date. Chair DeBenedet invited public comments at this time. <br />Public Comment <br />Mike Beraopce, Ace Waste Management <br />Chair DeBenedet advised Mr. Beraopce of ongoing discussions related to various <br />community-wide issues related to solid waste collection for residents, in an effort <br />to reduce wear and tear on local streets from multiple and repeated garbage trucks <br />on those streets, given current budget constraints for repair or replacement of <br />those streets. Chair DeBenedet recognized the need for any action to preserve <br />market shares for each hauler, and asked Mr. Beraopce to comment from his <br />perspective on how the City could do so, while allowing competition to continue. <br />Chair DeBenedet advised that, following additional research, the PWET <br />Commission would invite all haulers to the table to hear their individual and <br />collective perspectives before making any recommendation to the City Council. <br />Mr. Beraopce opined that, from his perspective, it came dawn to a belief system: <br />whether you believe in the competitive market and how it works in specific <br />communities. Mr. Beraopce advised that in Roseville, as well as most <br />communities in the metropolitan area, the open market system was in place, with <br />haulers earning their customers one at a time, and developing serving <br />relationships one on one with them. Mr. Beraopce advised that this was how his <br />company had based their reputation over the last 55 years; and that the type of <br />discussion being held at the PWET Commission level threatened that competitive <br />market system. Mr. Beraopce addressed the freedom of choice and reluctance to <br />involve government in the relationship bf service provider and customer; impacts <br />to pricing structures; political considerations; choices currently available for <br />residents in "shopping" for a refuse hauler competitively and service-wise; and <br />considerations ofresidents in their choice. <br />Mr. Beraopce also addressed road wear and tear, noting that over the years, those <br />vehicles had evolved, with more axles spreading the weight; and other issues with <br />road maintenance based on normal frost/thaw cycles, not just vehicle weight and <br />type. <br />Mr. Beraopce specifically addressed the MPCA report, noting that it was very <br />controversial within the refuse industry, with the report originally commissioned <br />to look at greenhouse gas emissions, and costing $90,000; while making <br />numerous erroneous or poorly-researched assumptions. Mr. Beraopce briefly <br />reviewed the report, and provided a summary of the industry's trade association <br />comments for member review, which had been submitted to the MPCA in <br />response to various assumptions in the report. Mr. Beraopce also provided <br />information on his eoinpany, showing alternatives to organized collection that are <br />being followed for residents in the community of Roseville. <br />