Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville PWET Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 11 ...October 27, 2009 <br />Mr. Beraopce advised that the competitive market industry was moving forward <br />environmentally as well; and asked that they be included in future discussions by <br />the PWET Commission on waste collection. <br />Discussion between Mr. Beraopce and members included concerns with multiple <br />braking and starting of the trucks, putting friction and wear on roadways, as well <br />as creating additional noise in residential neighborhoods; potential benefits to <br />individual haulers to be guaranteed a given segment of customers within a <br />community, providing the same market share and potential for growth, with <br />guaranteed revenue without commensurate expenses; city involvement in grading <br />service for individual residents; assumptions for fuel usage calculations; and <br />greenhouse gas emissions coming from 75% other uses, with only 25% <br />represented by transportation, with most of that corning from passenger vehicles, <br />aviation, marine and rail, with diesel trucks representing 18% of that 25% <br />transportation number. <br />Further discussion included how to reduce truc <br />representing 17% of the 25% transportation calculi <br />and not substantiating a significant portion of over <br />current zoning in Roseville by various garbage toll <br />versus current open market competition; current re <br />and haulers, with no government interference; lc <br />unpaid bills for residential customers as a cost of <br />impacts if the City were to require garbage trucks <br />legislation already in place. <br />mileage; all diesel trucks <br />~n, not just garbage trucks, <br />greenhouse gas emissions; <br />.ors; additional bureaucracy <br />ionship between customers <br />experience of haulers on <br />ping business; and minimal <br />be double axle, with some <br />Mr. Beraopce advised that the open market system breeds innovation, and they <br />were supportive of reasonable technical, regulation versus market manipulation. <br />Further discussion included costs for organized versus same open market service <br />($17 versus $25); lack of a scientific method and numerous variable assumptions <br />shown as a disclaimer in the MPCA study, with the industry contending that the <br />prices were based on random sampling rather than reality across the board, with <br />the number closer to the organized number for the open market price. Mr. <br />Beraopce reviewed various options from a pricing perspective (i.e., senior <br />discount; annual payment discount) to customize different needs for individual or <br />neighborhood groups or collectives. <br />5. 2010 Public Works Workplan <br />Ms. Bloom and Mr. Schwartz provided the 2010 Public Works Workplan as <br />adopted at the October 26, 2009 City Council meeting; listing various <br />infrastructure improvements planned in 2010, and briefly highlighted those items <br />of significance. <br />Discussion included availability of the document on the City's website; <br />comparisons with 2009 costs, as well as five-year averages for mill and overlay. <br />