Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville PWET Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 13 ~ October 27, 2009 <br />Further discussion included individual and collective ranking rationale; how the <br />public survey information from the four community meetings was incorporated <br />into the ranking process; the need to provide greater detail and description of each <br />program for the ranking process before and after editing; level of understanding <br />and additional education needed as the BFO process continues over the next few <br />years; and the entire process being a learning curve for all parties. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted several areas that staff may combine, such as project support <br />for engineering, in future years to allow more refined project delivery cost <br />representation. <br />Additional discussion included employee costs assumptions (benefits, COLA); <br />debt service; and projections on the Emerald Ash Borer and additional Dutch Elm <br />diseased tree costs and impacts. <br />7. Agenda for Next Meeting -November 24, 2009 <br />Chair DeBenedet noted that, even though it was Thanksgiving week, the PWET <br />needed to meet for further refinement of the illicit stormwater ordinance for <br />recommendation to the City Council to meet the end-of--year deadline <br />requirements as set forth. <br />Chair DeBenedet also noted the November agenda would also include additional <br />discussion on the 2010 Public Works Budget; garbage collection; and <br />undergrounding utilities and power lines on Rice Street. <br />Member Felice requested how the PWET could address the condition of medians <br />and plantings along Snelling and other major thoroughfares in the City of <br />T _ _ ___'77_ ~_ ____.____.~. _-_~l__~_...- <br />vartz advised that this was an ongoing problem of maintenance, due to <br />of maintenance resources of the State of MN and Ramsey County for <br />Discussion included areas where weeds were overgrown; whether a permeable <br />surface was called for; expected levels of maintenance by the public; development <br />of costs prepared by City staff for the City to take over mowing, based on <br />numerous citizen comments to the City Council, in addition to some <br />Councilmember interest in additional maintenance along Snelling being included <br />in the budget process. <br />Ms. Bloom advised members that MnDOT is looking at an overlay project, not a <br />reconstruction project, in the area of Snelling from County Road B to Larpenteur <br />Avenue potentially for consideration in 2010, but that the project would not <br />include landscaping and only consist of pavement maintenance. Ms. Bloom <br />advised that a meeting the MnDOT was pending, and that MnDOT was aware of <br />