My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-17_Agenda
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2006
>
2006-01-17_Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 8:05:06 AM
Creation date
3/24/2010 10:38:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/17/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />Attachment A <br />Proposed Rental Licensing Code <br />November 28, 2005 <br />7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />The following is a summary of the pu blic hearing comments and questions <br />regarding the proposed rental licensing code. Staff responses are in italics. <br />Of the 382 notices sent to possible rental owners, 16 total comments were <br />received. <br /> - 4 wanted more regulation and were in support <br /> - 2 had general questions – not sure if pro or con <br /> - 10 were opposed to regulations – 4 of these were duplex owners who live <br />in one side <br /> <br />1. What is the origin and purpose of the rental ordinance? Staff Response - 15 <br />The increase of small (mostly single fa mily) rental properties has become a <br />neighborhood issue and concern of sing le family property owners over the <br />past 3-5 years. Property owners ge nerally do not like to see their <br />neighborhood go rental, but what gets them upset is the disruption to the <br />peaceful livability of the neighborh ood the rental properties sometimes <br />cause. The cause of the disruption and nature of the complaints is usually <br />overcrowding within a rental unit and having 6-8 renters results in 6-8 cars, <br />etc. Over and over the same scenario plays out; we tell the complainant we <br />suspect the renters are in violation of City Code but that the City has no <br />authority to enter the rental and enforc e this provision. Then they get even <br />more upset. “Why can’t you protect us from these? They are businesses <br />detracting from our neighborhood. Roseville used to be a nice place to raise a <br />family, not anymore!” This has been a very frustrating issue for property <br />owners and city staff alike. The main issues are occupancy loads <br />(overcrowding), parking (more cars that can fit in the driveway resulting in <br />parking on the grass, mud and dead lawn s, and parking in front of neighbors <br />homes – which results in blocking visibi lity when they leave their driveways), <br />late evening conduct, outside storage of junk and household items and <br />general exterior lack of maintenance such as home’s exterior not kept <br />painted, lawns not mowed, garbage left ou tside and in disarray, etc. Also, the <br />codes and fire staff have experienced an increasing number of interior <br />complaints and issues such as placing sleeping beds in dangerous locations, <br />adding bedrooms without permits, inad equate egress windows in basements, <br />splitting single-family homes into duplex es and duplexes into triplexes, mold <br />and water damage in places were people are renting and refusing to fix the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.