Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br /> 25 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br /> 30 <br />staff time each year, are much more di fficult to resolve, can’t be properly <br />addressed with existing code language and are negatively impacting quiet <br />residential neighborhoods. <br /> <br />3. Why are we not looking at larger complexes? Staff Response - Through the 5 <br />HRA neighborhood meetings, no comp laints were heard regarding the <br />designated apartment complexes. When asked what changes residents were <br />observing in their neighb orhoods the most common concern was how single <br />family homes were being turned into re ntal properties and frustration with <br />the city’s lack of regulation of thes e homes. We are not denying that there <br />are some issues within Roseville’s larg e aging complexes. However, they are <br />professionally maintained and manage d. These complexes typically have <br />easily attainable on-site professional contacts and most have on-site or <br />contracted maintenance and lawns servic es, and there is more monitoring of <br />public spaces within those complexes currently through fire inspections and <br />Section 8 inspections. With Roseville’s apartment buildings aging, inspection <br />of these types of buildings will likely be necessary in the future in-order to <br />ensure they stay well maintained and so that they do not deteriorate, <br />generate crime and depress property values of surrounding neighborhoods. <br />All cities face this possibility and most cities around Roseville have already <br />taken steps to address this possibility. If Roseville does not remain current <br />with other surrounding cities in its regu lations, it could act as a magnet and <br />draw the wrong elements who feel they would not have to maintain buildings <br />as well as other communities. <br />4. Focusing on only the small rentals is discriminatory . Staff Response - 26 <br />Addressing a specific problem is not discriminatory. Rather, the City’s <br />housing and public safety goals are being addressed by dealing with the <br />issues. <br />5. 907.22: Tenant Identification – What is the purpose of identification of the 31 <br />number of adults and children in licensed rental properties? Is this a data <br />privacy issue? Staff Response - Identification of tenants is important for <br />public safety as well as to help in the calculation of occupancy limits. A <br />suggested revision would be to provide the tenant head of household with the <br />identification of the number of adults and children (relat ed and unrelated) <br />living in the unit. City attorney notes that asking for the information is not a <br />data privacy issues but it would be come a data privacy issues if the <br />information was requested by someone ot her than for internal city use of <br />which the City processes for reviewing such issues would protect individual <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40