Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 3 <br />Other Potential Housing Fund Sources: <br />The City should consider that there are other possi ble sources of funding that could be reserved <br />for this type of large project renovation le nding. The following is a brief summary of those <br />sources: <br /> <br />1. Unobligated Tax Increment Revenues from Other Housing Related Projects – There <br />could be some unobligated tax in crement revenues from other projects in the City that <br />could be applied to providing loan funds for housing improvements. This option needs to <br />be further evaluated but the city’s overall ta x increment plan for the entire city clearly <br />identifies using tax increment for housing improvement purposes. <br />2. Individual Loans for only those with lower incomes – This could pr ovide a specific <br />target to only those with lower incomes but wo uld also be a less secu re lending method as <br />each loan would be subordinate to the owner’s 1 st mortgage. Taxes are generally in a <br />higher position than mortgage and paid first. <br /> <br />Financial Need of Owners: <br />The Council may also wish to consider the fina ncial means of the property owners in Westwood <br />Village I. According to Ramsey County Propert y Records, the average value of these town <br />home units is approximately $211,000. The Citywide median value is $216,000. Providing <br />financial assistance to average-valued homes sets an unusually low eligibility standard. If this <br />were the only benchmark, approximately 5,000 home owners in Roseville would be eligible for <br />similar assistance. However, many of these owne rs have lived in their unit for many years and <br />their home value is not a factor of what they can financially affo rd but rather a factor of the <br />market inflation over a long period of time. <br /> <br />A self certification of income was prepared and mailed to all of the unit owners within <br />Westwood Village. As of the date of this report the following is a summary of those results. (See <br />attached sample provided by Ramsey County and used for the survey) <br /> <br /> 33 of the 47 units returned complete d surveys or a 70% return rate. <br /> Of those 33 units, 61% have incomes at or belo w 120% of the average me dian income for the <br />metropolitan area as summarized below. The HR A has set 120% as an affordable workforce <br />housing limit within other programs such as th e Family Affordable Loan Program, Housing <br />Redesign Program and Applewood Pointe Project. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> According to funding requirements of other public entities for multi-family projects such as <br />(HUD, MHFA, Met Council and Ramsey County), 51% of the units must be deemed <br />affordable to be eligible for public assistance. This project meets and exceeds that definition <br />based upon Roseville’s affordable housing limits. <br /> In addition, 54% of the house holds are over the age of 55. <br /> <br /> <br />Income Level <br />% of total <br />affordable units <br />Below 50% AMI 5% <br />Between 51% - 60% AMI 10% <br />Between 61% - 80% AMI 35% <br />Between 81% - 100% AMI 30% <br />Between 101% - 120% AMI 20%