Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 4 <br /> <br />Housing Policy Issues: <br /> <br />One of the key goals in the Rose ville HRA Housing Plan is to: <br /> <br />a. “Preserve existing housing and develop new housing in partnership with federal, <br />state and regional agencies and non-prof it community groups and businesses.” <br /> <br />The RHRA Housing Plan and Policies are incorporated and adopted into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br />The RHRA has spent several years studying the h ousing conditions and specifically the condition and <br />possible deterioration of older multi family housing co mplexes. As part of the 2003 Multi-family housing <br />study it was concluded that a ll types of Multifamily Housing are important to the community and <br />need to be preserved with a full spectrum of multifamily maintenance programs to increase the <br />value, quality and livability of the multifamily housing stock. The study indicated that the <br />multifamily housing stock is aging and reinvestme nt is critical. Critical improvements will <br />become necessary such as windows, roof, heatin g and air handling systems, energy conservation <br />and electrical services and accessibility. <br /> <br />The study addressed why is it good public po licy to assist in improving multi-family <br />housing stock. There are approximately 9,000 Roseville residents who live in some type of <br />multifamily housing. These residents are an import ant strand of the community fabric. Helping <br />to ensure that they live in qua lity, stable housing reduces social problems that impact neighbors <br />and increase the demands on life-safety, school and so cial services. In add ition, it is critical to <br />maintain this aging (and yet affordable) housing st ock to ensure that prope rty values keep current <br />with the surrounding communities and inflationary indexes. Once the value of housing begins to <br />decline the impact on the community will in crease services, complaints and crime <br /> <br />Section 4.7 of the housing plan specifically refers to the creation of HIA as a tool to achieve the City’s <br />housing goals: “Evaluate the establishment of Hous ing Improvement Districts to address ownership <br />multi-family improvements – (Town home and Condo). Work with the town homes and condominiums <br />in Roseville that were built in the 1970’s and are ag ing.” With over 1,700 ownership multifamily housing <br />units, many of which were constructed over 30 years ago, these are one of the most affordable housing <br />types in the community. The findings of the Roseville HRA’s multi-family study also indicated that those <br />older units include a majority of people over the age of 55. Many of these town home/condo associations <br />have not set aside adequate home owners associati on dues to cover the escalating construction costs over <br />the years. Therefore, the funding of large associa tion improvements are either delayed or increases the <br />monthly payment to a level that many seniors or lower income individuals can not afford. <br /> <br />The MN State Legislature created the HIA legisla tive authority for the purposes of assisting older <br />complexes to finance major improvements so that there would be less of a financial burden on the <br />residents. When these older complexes were construc ted, they were not required to collect adequate <br />reserves for future capital improvements. Nor did they anticipate properly the n eed to collect additional <br />funds for larger project improvements. Newer to wn home complexes have learned from the past and <br />organizing legal documents require that a certain percen tage of reserves be held in anticipation of large <br />capital improvements. Older complexes are still trying to catch up. Part of the process for a HIA requires <br />that a financial plan be completed by the association so that future fund balances will be available for <br />large capital projects. In the case of Westwood Village I, they have indicated that the single-board, cedar <br />siding was a big selling point for the original builder and owners were told when a board goes bad they <br />could just pop it off and replace it. Since 1969, previ ous owners believed that literally and never budgeted <br />for full siding replacement. <br /> <br />