My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-08-16_Agenda
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2005
>
2005-08-16_Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2010 3:50:04 PM
Creation date
3/24/2010 3:47:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/16/2005
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
implemented to address both owner occupied single family code deficiencies as well as <br />single family rental housing issues to include the City Council adoption of a housing <br />maintenance code, City Council implementation of a single family rental licensing program <br />and increased HRA communication with neighborhoods and new residents. <br />Recommend Adoption of a Housing Maintenance Code such as the International <br />Property Maintenance Code as recommended by the Roseville Code <br />Enforcement staff and by the I35W Corridor Cities.housing <br /> A new <br />maintenance code <br /> would target maintenance issues of owner occupied and rental <br />properties for exterior condition of the home. The current nuisance code does not <br />affectively address many of the neighborhood issues observed through the <br />neighborhood meetings and by codes staff. <br />Implement a Rental Licensing Program for Single Family homes, Duplexes and <br />Fourplexes. <br /> This would address code deficiencies for rental properties with the <br />ability to annually inspect both the interior and exterior of rental properties. When <br />the inspection results in compliance, the property is issued a license and ability to rent <br />the home. If there are code violations, they must be fixed prior to issuance of a <br />license. Renting the home without a license can result in an administrative fine and <br />hinder the owner’s ability to rent the home. The specifics of the program will be <br />more fully evaluated by the Council and HRA over the next few months. However, <br />the following is a basic summary of the proposed program, estimated costs and <br />suggested fees. <br />Many of the communities that surround Roseville have implemented rental <br />licensing programs. Each program has its variation as seen in the attached chart <br />which provides a summary of the programs, associated fees and how the program <br />is funded. Assuming the Council decides to have the HRA implement this <br />program, the chart and comparisons will provide the HRA with an estimate of <br />typical inspection fees that are charged in the metro area. <br />With the current work load of the existing code enforcement staff, it is estimated <br />that a part time inspector and a quarter time clerical position would be necessary <br />to support the additional compliance issues associated with the housing <br />maintenance code and rental inspections. It is estimated that to fund the position <br />$60,000 - $80,000 annually would be required <br />and administrative expenses, . <br />Staff has also requested estimates to contract for this service through the <br />Housing Resource Center as an alternative to hiring new staff. Staff <br />estimates these contract costs may be up to 40-50% less. <br />The cost of the new program will be partially offset by fees paid by rental owners. <br />Using Ramsey County data for single family non-homestead properties, plus <br />duplexes, triplexes and four plexes, there are an estimated 350 units subject to <br />annual licensing. Using the average fee per unit charged by other communities of <br />$50 per unit, a total of $17,500 could be collected in fees. The maximum charged <br />by the communities evaluated was $75 per unit which would generate $26,250 in <br />annual fees. At best, this revenue can support 40 to 50% of the estimated costs. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.