Laserfiche WebLink
3.Background <br />How did the study area become an issue? <br />The McCarrons Neighborhood Study Area became an issue because the house located at 185 N. <br />McCarrons Blvd had become vacant and the lot was not being maintained to a standard that an <br />occupied home might be. On June 2, 2003, the City of Roseville codes staff asked for City <br />Council direction regarding this code compliance case at 185 N. McCarrons Blvd. The property <br />is owned by a St. Paul housing developer named Dennis Guptil. The Council asked that the case <br />be reviewed by the HRA as soon as possible to review possible options for redevelopment of the <br />vacant housing site prior to considering the pursuit of court citations. The specific items of <br />concern included: <br />Dilapidated existing garage with non functioning door, peeling paint, bad repair <br />Yard with grass far in excess of the 8 inches maximum allowed and overgrown <br />shrubbery. <br />Debris in the yard. <br />Dilapidated vacant house with peeling paint, fallen rain gutters and broken windows. <br />Subsequently, Mr. Guptil worked with the City Codes staff and addressed all issued except for <br />the condition of the garage. However, the vacant home and lot continue to remain unsightly to <br />the neighborhood and redevelopment as soon as possible is encouraged. <br />In June of 2003 the Roseville HRA discussed the site and its issues with Mr. Guptil. At that time <br />he expressed interest in developing the site and was willing to review possible options with the <br />HRA. The HRA asked him to work with HRA staff and to bring back a timeline and process for <br />development of the site within 60 days. <br />Mr. Guptil has identified many opportunities for reuse of the site such as town homes, <br />condominiums and senior rental housing. However, there are several factors that need to be <br />considered prior to committing to the development of the site. Those factors include the lot <br />terrain, wetland, surrounding land uses and market for new housing. Mr. Guptil had met with <br />City staff in 2001 for development of the site as town homes. However, the density needed to <br />economically make the project feasible did not account for accommodating the existing wetland <br />on site. Changes to the wetland shape and/or size would be needed, and further work with the <br />Capitol Region Watershed would be necessary. <br />Through a series of public meetings with the City Council, Planning Commission, neighborhood <br />residents, property owners, faith-based groups and education entities, National Guard, developers <br />and various staff members, a Plan could be created that would provide flexible land use <br />procedures to guide development and redevelopment in the future. The McCarrons <br />Neighborhood Association was invited to participate in this project plan review during the fall of <br />2003 where the neighborhood task force members were identified to work through the process <br />with the City staff. <br />DRAFT MARCH 10, 2004 3 <br /> <br />