My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
100329_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2010
>
100329_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2013 10:03:11 AM
Creation date
3/26/2010 8:37:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/29/2010
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment C <br />T4C currentfy services 50Q churchgoers once or twice each week and has plans to ha�e <br />the ability to serve up to 1,000 churchgoers in three dis�inct lang.uage assemE�fies at a <br />single site. This aflaws couples with diverse language skills and their English-speaking <br />children to share #he assembly, teaching and sotial times tagether in one building. As <br />tY�e IargesC Chinese-oriented c�urch asserr�bly in the metro area with o�er 50 years of <br />history and strong ties in comm�nity ser�+ice in the Roseville community arEa, T4C wfluld <br />be a significant Cuftural Institution with spaces for Meeting Hall, Business and <br />Counseling Offices, Music & Dance instruction and performance, for7raditional dining in <br />line with the Restaurant I classification-- all currentEy permitted uses in the 8-3 District. <br />Minimum Requirements for the Business Zonin� pistricts are shown in 5ection 1005.01. <br />They are identical between the 8-3 zoning classification and the B-� that allows the <br />church use. <br />How does the use of the 2755 Lan Lake Road site b 74C fit with future lnstitu#ional <br />Zoning Glassificatian_pos�ibly �o he proposed in the pendin� zoni�� chanp� in the fall <br />of 2.01�? <br />The pending changes are specificalfy unknown at this #ime and it is anticipated tF�at an <br />applica#ion will be submitted and acted upon before the revisions to the zoning code are <br />drafted and adopted this coming fall. <br />That said, �lanning sfaff has suggested a possibie new Institutional Zoning District <br />classificatian that would apply ta large campus-type land use area5 so labeled on the <br />comprehensive plan, and might apply to some of the smaller church and socia! ciub <br />parcels also currently labeled as Institutional on the Comp Plan. This designation might <br />be considered a spot-zoning o�erlay responding to-- and intenc�ed t� better regulate-- <br />existrng campus-type use patterns for school, civic, sociaf, and possibly religious uses. <br />In being appEied to churches, this would. mark a significant c�ange in the zoning modef <br />where church use has tracfitionally be braadcast around the city within smaller, <br />neighborhood-centered churches iocated wit�in the residential areas they servQ. The <br />growing cantemporary model of regional scaEe churches based on size and <br />differentiating aspects, such as the ethnic focus of 1"4C, seems to be more appropriate <br />to Che Regional Business (RB) areas shawn in the Comprehensive Plan with proximity <br />and identity to rnajor arterial acces5, rather than funneling this traffic into and through <br />residential neighborhoods. <br />It also should be nated that current land use planning relating to churches must be <br />directed by federal regulation respecting the Reiigious Land Use & Insti�utionalized <br />Person Act (RLUIPA}] <br />f\c�di�ional Requircd Infornlation, �'a��e 7 ot�7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.