Laserfiche WebLink
PART VII. DISCUSSION OF KING C TE <br />1. This project is not identified in a WMO plan since the product has never been <br />used in Minnesota as far as the sponsors know. <br />2. The City of Roseville has successfully administered grants from the Met Council <br />before, most notably the Macarron Lake storm water pond project that the Met <br />Council has studied extensively. <br />3. The work plan is simple... test the product and develop a report on the <br />adoptability of the product to Minnesota conditions. In the project's simplicity <br />_ lies its strength. <br />4. The budget seems realistic due to the unproven nature of the product. The <br />product is designed to be re-used three times but careful use should prolong the <br />product life. <br />5. If the project verifies that the product is suited for use in Minnesota, it is likely <br />that many LGUs would specify its use, especially in Land development scenarios in <br />environmentally sensitive areas. <br />6. The willingness of the City of Roseville to participate in the testing a new erosion <br />control product and its past involvement in the Macarron Lake project <br />demonstrates the City's long-term commitment to non-point source pollution <br />education. <br />