My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1995-10-26_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
199x
>
1995
>
1995-10-26_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2010 3:56:54 PM
Creation date
4/12/2010 3:14:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/26/1995
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 ~/ TALK Spring -Summer 1 5 <br />tl <br />nt hector f the ivisi aters <br />The 1995 legislative session was a significant one for the DNR-Division of Waters and others with an <br />interest in Water Resource Management. The discussions that centered around reform of the Wetland <br />Conservation Act of 1991 were some of the most. spirited and challenging water resource dialog in recent <br />years. <br />Although the Wetland Bill was considered in speMal session, it did not pass. On Wednesday an agreement <br />was reached aver what should be in the bill; however, the bill that was introduced for the special session on <br />Thursday had been changed. The revised biU passed the House but did not pass the Senate. The wetland <br />debate will be back in force next year. In the meantime, the advocates of wetland. regulation reform will <br />continue to push for changes and wetland regulators will face frustrated customers as a result of the _ <br />amendments to the Wetlands Act not being realized. The Department does support making changes to the <br />- Wetlands Conservation Act. <br />The major piece of legislation for the DOW was our Policy Bill. 'ibis bill provides: '=,- <br />1. Corrections of minor errors due to recodification in 1990. <br />2. Provision to allow for the delegation of permit authority to watershed districts and water ~ ~ ~' <br />management organizations (this authority exists for counties). `=" <br />=..< <br />_ 3. Provision to allow for the DOW to issue general permits for projects of minimal impacts _a; <br />- (e.g., bridges and culverts). - `~ <br />:; <br />4. The ability to provide 100% state funding for the removal of public or privately owned <br />dams. - ~ ; <br />This session was also a biennial budget session and agency base budgets were not provided any increases = `:' <br />Yo cover salary increases or inflation. This amounts to a reduction in buying power. ~,' <br />`. '-a <br />The funding of the County Geologic Atlas was approved in the Division's General Ftmd budget, after being <br />funded by the LCMR in the previous two biennium. This will provide for more stable funding for the program. <br />There are many individual issues that arise during a legislative session and some themes appear to be ~ :;~ <br />around for next year. Perhaps the most significant would be the Thkings/Property Rights issue. This topic s@ <br />will be addressed more fully in a. future issue. - ~ - <br />~ _ <br />- ~.. ,. <br />~ <br /> .J _.. ... <br />~ :.. _{._~:_ <br />_`` <br />t i.: ~:.) "' <br />~_..~ ~~ ~ ~. Lis i4 i <br />1C. ~ i_~C:~ <br /> <br /> <br />BuAc Rate <br />U.S. Poatape <br />PAID <br />Pom9t No. 171 <br />St, Paul. MN <br />- 'w. <br />:.: <br />.. i.. <br />M <br />.~5: <br />- <br />-~ <br />- ~ I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.