My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1995-10-26_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
199x
>
1995
>
1995-10-26_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2010 3:56:54 PM
Creation date
4/12/2010 3:14:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/26/1995
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minimum involvement. Some watershed districts exist only to satisfy the legal <br />requirements imposed by the State legislature. Activities of such organizations include <br />the preparation of a watershed plan, periodic updates of that plan, annual meetings, and <br />review of member city stormwater management plans and updates. If GLWMO was to <br />provide only the minimum services required, the total budget could be reduced to <br />between $5,000 and $10,000 per year depending on the planning activities required. <br />2. Strom regulatory involvement. Some organizations, like the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District, have chosen to involve themselves in all aspects of watershed management. In <br />addition to minimum requirements, such organizations require and review permits for all <br />development within the watershed. As would be expected, such organizations spend a <br />great deal more money than those organizations choosing to provide the minimum <br />amount of services. An aggressive watershed the size of GLWMO could spend upwards <br />of $500,000 annually. <br />During its creation, GLWMO was organized as a policy making organization. Day to day <br />management of the watershed, including permitting responsibilities, have been delegated to each <br />member city. While GLWMO has accomplished more than the minimum activities required by <br />law, it would still be considered relatively inactive when compared to other similar organizations. <br />To date, the board has attempted. to be fiscally responsible by limiting its expenditures to those <br />activities which it feels will provide the largest gain. <br />FUNDING <br />As outlined in the joint powers agreement, funding for GLWMO studies, operation, and capital <br />improvement projects are split equally between Shoreview and Roseville. Each year, the <br />GLWMO Board adopts a proposed budget. The proposed budget is then approved as part of the <br />budgeting process for each of the member cities. Each city's contribution to GLWMO is held in a <br />separate fund administered by the Roseville Finance Department. <br />The original GLWMO plan, completed in 1986, proposed a rather aggressive capital improvement <br />program. Between 1984 and 1990 Shoreview and Roseville contributed an annual combined <br />average of $66,000 to GLWMO. Because a number of the planned projects were reduced in <br />scope or not constructed, the fund balance of GLWMO grew. In an effort to be fiscally <br />responsible, the board chose not to request member city contributions for the years 1991 through <br />1995 and to fund GLWMO activities through the fund balance. Currently, the fund balance has <br />dwindled to approximately $2,000. In order for operations to continue, it is necessary that the <br />member cities resume annual contributions. <br />1996 BUDGET <br />At its July 20, 1995, meeting, the board discussed a preliminary budget for 1996 of $50,600. A <br />copy of that budget is attached. Because Roseville and Shoreview have not contributed to the <br />GLWMO fund since 1990 and since operating and capital expenditures have been funded through <br />the budget reserve, the current fund balance has been depleted. If GLWMO is to continue as it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.