Laserfiche WebLink
Summer/Fall 1995 WATER TALK Page 5 <br />„.continued from page 4 <br />The residents told the city council the <br />cleaning was too much work. 'They were tired <br />of cleaning," she said. When the council asked <br />if there was interest in relocating to higher <br />ground, the residents responded quite <br />favorably. <br />The town of Springfield believes that "the <br />acquisition of the homes and relocation of the <br />homeowners is by far the best flood damage <br />reduction measure," Schwieger noted. The <br />Springfield City Council said the homes <br />along Cass Avenue "have been flooded in the <br />past, and without the relocation program <br />would have been flooded in the future." <br />Marian Schwieger feels the relocation <br />was a complete success. "Some of the <br />residents worried that they wouldn't be paid <br />enough for their homes, but they were all <br />very happy with the outcome. HUD <br />appraised their houses at the value before <br />flood damages, so that was a really good <br />deal for some. One family chose to stay in <br />their house, but the others decided to <br />relocate. The residents I've talked to have <br />been very happy, with nice homes located <br />high above the floodplain. They feel safe <br />and don't have to worry about the river." <br />The city council was very happy with the way <br />FEMA and the MVAC handled the <br />program. `The agencies worked together well. <br />They helped and worked with the residents, <br />and they kept us very well informed and called <br />everyday." <br />Only nine months after funding was <br />approved (on March 24, 1994), the first house <br />was demolished. Representatives from all the <br />agencies were in Springfield that day, which <br />illustrates how important teamwork was in this <br />program. <br />Schwieger also noted the relocation will <br />save the town, state, and federal government <br />a lot of money. Damage estimates and city <br />costs for Springfield's major floods total <br />almost $400,000. This doesn't include years <br />when no estimates were available for costs of <br />fighting the flooding. Relocation also <br />eliminates the hardships and danger caused <br />by reoccurrent flooding. <br />An expanded Riverside Park <br />encompasses the area where the flooded <br />houses once stood. It is the kind of open <br />space use of the floodplain which the <br />Springfield Floodplain Management <br />Ordinance encourages. <br />The purpose of the Floodplain Management <br />Ordinance is to promote wise land use <br />management in the floodplain. Restoration of <br />natural floodplain areas through the relocation <br />of existing homes and businesses has been <br />found to be acost-effective solution to eliminate <br />or reduce reoccurring flood damages. <br />„.~ntinued on page 9 <br />One of the fourte~ homes that was demoltshsd as families chose <br />to find peace of mind and move to higher ground. During this <br />summer's storms, the river threatened to flood again. Families who <br />chose 4o relocate were worry fry. <br />This home, located near Riverside Park, did not escape flood <br />damages. Ths property is bcated adjacent to the Cottonwood <br />River and a bridge crossing. <br />