Laserfiche WebLink
The Water BillBoard <br />Flood damage reduction <br />information: DNR areal <br />regional irvdrologist or <br />,loe Gibson <br />512-295-2773 <br />'Nell sealing in~orma- <br />tion: Dan Zwilling <br />51 ?-295-0427 <br />State bonding to fund <br />#3ood damage reduction <br />Bonding funds of 51,490,000 provided as a <br />match'(50 percent cost-share) to local or <br />other non-state funds for flood damage <br />reduction efforts were approved by the <br />1996 Legislature. <br />The DNR Division of Waters is responsible <br />for the administration ofthe state flood <br />damage reduction program, which assists <br />local units of government in constructing <br />flood control and flood mitigation projects. <br />The DNR maintains a priority list for <br />eligible projects, and forthe firsttime has <br />received authority to fund. detailed design <br />work for eligible projects in addition to <br />funding actual construction. <br />The Si,490,000 allocated will provide funds <br />to the foilowins projects: <br />City ofHouston Levee <br />City of Marshall Flood Control Project <br />City of StiIIwater Flood Wall <br />City of Cook Flood Impoundment <br />C fry of Montevideo Levee <br />City of Rochester -Mayo Run <br />Stormwater Detention Project <br />Should funds become available as a result <br />of rinaiizing contract amounts, additional <br />eligible projects from the state priority fist <br />may be funded. The state also has an <br />annual general fund appropriation of <br />5167,000 to provide cost-share (~0 percent) <br />funds for Local flood damage reduction <br />efforts. The maximum per project is <br />57,000. <br />WeII sealing pursued <br />o state land <br />The 1996 Capitol Bonding Bill included an <br />appropriation of 5696,000 (of which <br />5276,000 comes from the seneral fund to <br />support staff) to allow the Division of <br />Waters to continue the search for and <br />sealing of unused wells on state property. <br />This funding covers the second biennium of <br />a three-biennium (six-year) effort to deal <br />with abandoned wells on state land in <br />Minnesota. This comprehensive effort has <br />idenrified 479 inactive wells to date that <br />need to be sealed; 347 wells have been <br />sealed underthe plan already. <br />The project has also documented 1307 <br />former dwelling sites that must be searched <br />for wens chat may not have been properly <br />sealed when the buildings were razed. To <br />date about i2 percent of these sites have <br />been searched by staff employing new <br />technologies. <br />The Division of Waters still expects to <br />complete the searches and seating of all <br />unused wells on state lands in six years. <br />Used oil collection <br />in~orrnation: <br />Par ,1latuseski <br />512- 297-8337 <br /> <br />Tne legislature made changes to the used. oil <br />collection requirements for do-it-yourselfer <br />(DIL")oil. The new requirements will allow <br />an industry coalition to put together a <br />voluntary DIY collection program, replacing <br />last year's mandate forretaiiers who sell <br />over 1000 filters to establish DIY collection <br />facilities throughout the state. The new law <br />requires an industry group to submit to the <br />YIPC ~ by Sept. 1, 1996 a list of all existing <br />DIY collection sites within the state that can <br />be used forpubIic promotion and education. <br />In addition, the group must submit a plan <br />for collecting and recycling used motor oil <br />and filters generated. by the public. The plan <br />must at a minimum be capable of providing <br />at least 90 percent of the state's residents <br />with a collection facility within 2~ miles in <br />greater~finnesota; within ~ mites in the <br />seven county metro area and in cities with <br />population of greater than 2,000 residents; <br />and at least one colle~ion site per county in <br />the state. The plan must be implemented by <br />June I, 1997. <br />