Laserfiche WebLink
Spring/Summer 1996 WATFR TALK Page 9 <br />+~~~ e~ <br />By Ed Fick <br />The Natural Resources Block Grant adminis- <br />tered by the Board of Water and Soil Resources <br />(B WSR), requires the 85 counties receiving this grant <br />to file an annual report discussing each county's <br />activities related to water planning, wetland conser- <br />vation, shoreland management, and feed lot manage- <br />ment activities. The Minnesota Department of <br />Natural Resources (DNR) summarized and analyzed <br />shoreland management activities reported by the 85 <br />counties who received a portion of the $528,000 the <br />DNR provides annually for administering and <br />enforcing the Minnesota shoreland Management <br />Program. <br />.The graphics display administrative and <br />enforcement activities by counties in response to <br />funding provided by the State of Minnesota. It <br />should be noted that the DNR allocated the <br />funding based on a formula that takes into <br />account miles of lake and river shoreland and <br />the amount of shoreland which is in private <br />ownership and contained within the legal <br />boundaries of each county. Publicly-awned land <br />was excluded since counties do not administer <br />shoreland controls over that land. <br />to be expected since zoning ordinances typically spell <br />out conditions expected to be met by local govern- <br />mental units (LGU) and if the applicant meets those <br />conditions, it~is up to the LGU to prove that the <br />application. is deficient.. <br />The second graphic shows the trends for <br />variances in the state. Minnesota Statutes put the <br />burden of proof on the applicant, not the LGU: The <br />counties proved to be slightly more selective with <br />regards to variances, approving 1374 out of 1699 for <br />81% approval. Many veteran county zoning officials <br />pointed out they often advise applicants not to apply <br />for a variance that will be denied outright, and often <br />make changes and negotiate the variances they do <br />approve, thus the 81% may not tell the whole story. <br />Variances <br />Denied 5'/° Tabled <br />14% <br />:k fi <br />v i~-a,,gs ~ ~a <br />~..-~ <br />$° Li 81'/° <br />Granted <br />Conditional Use Permits <br />Denied Tabled <br />6% 7% <br />,- <br />~~ <br />r.. <br />~~.; <br />s7% Granted <br />The first graphic shows that out of 701 <br />applications for conditional use permits, 609 were <br />approved, or 87%. These numbers are about what is <br />If there are any questions about this <br />material, or if you would like a copy of the <br />report, please contact Ed Fick at (612) 296-0528 <br />or by writing to <br />DNR - Division of Waters <br />500 Lafayette Road <br />St. Paul, MN 55155-4032 ^ <br />Department of <br />~ Natural Resources <br />Division of Waters <br />Printed on Recycled Paper <br />~i Contains 15% postconsumer waste <br />