My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-07-22_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
199x
>
1999
>
1999-07-22_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2010 3:07:19 PM
Creation date
4/13/2010 3:05:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/22/1999
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State agencies must maintain two-way communication <br />with Ioca1 watershed organizations in order to make the <br />most of local efforts. <br />3. Staff Resaurces <br />When organizations' staffing levels are compared to a <br />weighted ranking of organizations implementing water- <br />quality efforts, we find the two are directly correlated. <br />WMOs with the lowest staffing levels also have the low- <br />est implementation rates. <br />INE3IVIDUAL CAPACITY <br />Research suggests that the capacities and motivations of <br />individual watershed decision-makers play a significant <br />role in the success of organized watershed efforts. <br />1. Concern farUVater Quality <br />When asked to rank their level of concern for water <br />quality, watershed decision-makers returned some strik- <br />ing results. WMOs rank significantly lower than Water- <br />shed Districts, JPBs and nonprofits. Nonprofit organiza- <br />tions demonstrate the highest level of concern for water <br />quality. <br />It is also interesting to note that level of concern for <br />water quality is correlated with the percentage of orga- <br />nizational types implementing water-quality projects. <br />2. Level of Education <br />The average level of education among watershed deci- <br />sion-makers varies across the four types of organizations. <br />However, all are above the state average. Our data shows <br />that higher levels of education are not related to imple- <br />mentation of water-quality activities. In fact, the organi- <br />zations with the highest average Level of education - <br />WMOs -have the Lowest percentage of organizations <br />implementing water-quality projects and programs. In <br />other words, higher education does not necessarily trans- <br />late into taking positive action in the watershed. <br />I~tPLE{Y(EI~Tf~ECs` VVATER- <br />C2UALITY EFFORTS <br />Using implementation of water-quality initiatives as a <br />measure of watershed-organization effectiveness, organi- <br />zations were ranked by their level of effort in implement- <br />ing water-quality projects. Differences in project type <br />(e.g., utilization of land-use Best Management Practices <br />vs. capital improvement projects) were equally ranked. <br /> <br /> <br />,, ~,.~,w.~ .. , ~~ <br />~« ~- dPa~ <br />3t <br />~eY~ 0~ GGnCP.'i~ <br />'1`t"V!i)s OI ,J`r~~s <br />siBC 07 ~k.,. Car~n^ <br />-ire are se. ~ , <br />;f,ts ten.: to exF>rv a _r.;~re- <br />ins \l:l(;TPr :~U81I t`y trlan c,~'~'lg! <br />Jon-prat argan~caticns are farmed cY pecpie <br />whe are car.cerned abokrt wafer gr~a!ity and <br />t"~ey surround themselves vJftn people ~n~ho <br />share the same conceal. In additio;r, they are <br />driven by a phifcsophy of activism rather than <br />by state mandate" <br />~~ <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.