My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000-05-04_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2000
>
2000-05-04_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2010 9:40:31 AM
Creation date
4/14/2010 9:28:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/4/2000
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ensuing years, while in and of themselves not that dramatic, have served to stabilize this improved condition. Tlus <br />explanation is consistent with the shallow lake bouus (Appendix xx). <br />Another indication drat Lake Owasso benefits from the shallow lake bonus is the fact that there is less algae in Lake <br />Owasso than expected based on the known patterns in other lakes. Normally, as lake phosphorus concentrations <br />increase, the amount of algae increases in turn. This is a predictable pattern. A model' has been developed that is <br />used to predict algae abundance (as measured by chlorophyll) from a lake's phosphorus concentration. By <br />examining the actual phosphorus and chlorophyll measurement from recent years, we see that the amount of algae <br />growth in Lake Owasso is less than other metro lakes with similar levels of phosphorus (see table below): <br />Year Phosphorus Measured CLA Predicted' CLA <br />1999 32 5 18 <br />1998 22 5 12 <br />1997 40 13 22 <br />1996 33 10 18 <br />1995 35 11 19 <br />1994 48 11 27 <br />1993 44 13 24 <br />1992 47 13 26 <br />1991 53 16 30 <br />1990 56 13 31 <br />1989 48 10 27 <br />1988 62 15 35 <br />[Note: There was some concern expressed by the Lake Owasso Association Executive Committee about the <br />promotion of the shallow lake theory and the conclusion that the Snail Lake experience shows this to be a workable <br />solution. To clarify, the Snail Lake experience is presented to show that there are other shallow lakes where algae is <br />reduced and there is clear water in association with abundant native plants. The conclusion that the plant protection <br />approach is `workable' for Snail Lake is in reference to the fact that the Snail Lake Association, when given this <br />option, agreed it was the best option for their lake. While this is also an option for Lake Owasso, this is not meant to <br />imply that it is the best or most workable option for Lake Owasso.] <br />Aquatic Plants <br />Aquatic plants have been evaluated periodically by DNR field crews or by Ramsey County Public Works. The <br />plant surveys were conducted using different field methods and at different times during the summer. This summary <br />lists which species were present, and omits details regarding the distribution of plants around the lake. <br />Aquatic Plant Survey Summaries -Lake Owasso <br />9/48 8/55 6/81 6/84 5/90 6/90 6/91 <br />Submerged plants species <br />Largeleaf pondweed P P P P P <br />Potamogeton atnplifolius <br />Curlyleaf pondweed * * P P P P P <br />Potamogeton crispus <br />Variable-leaf pondweed P <br />Potamogeton gramineus <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.