Laserfiche WebLink
Executive Director s Perspective <br />s e or ro s, ocs its <br />n the past, environmental activities, such as Earth Day, were aimed at providing people with a basic <br />understanding of the concept of the inter-relationship of basic earth systems. Ecology was a new term and <br />something totally missing in formal education and casual conversation up to that time. <br />Today most people are familiar with the concept of the inter-relationship of all living things, but there is a <br />wide divergence of opinion about the impacts of human activity and the consumptive use of the resource base on <br />the planet's systems such as the debate about the impact of human activity on the rate of increase in global <br />warming. <br />Today it seems the focus needs to be on educating people in developed countries particularly, on the concept <br />of the Ecological Footprint. People need to begin to understand what needs to be done to maintain the sustainable <br />inhabitation of this planet by a substantial human population. <br />According to the Earth Day Network, the average resident in the U.S. requires 12 global hectares yearly (about <br />30 acres of land) to support his or her lifestyle. The average for the whole earth is 2.9 hectares for each of the nearly <br />six billion inhabitants. Countries closest to the U.S. in the number of hectares per person are the Scandinavian <br />countries with Ecological Footprints from the mid tens to mid twenties. Some of the lowest countries are Pakistan at <br />one and China about two hectares per person. <br />The more critical figures, however, are the estimates of "current capacity" in each country and for: the whole <br />earth, The estimates show a deficit of 0.7 hectare for the whole earth's population, and a U.S. deficit of 7.0 <br />hectares. None of these footprint values include any allowance for the 10 million or so other species that,abd~ <br />with us within the ecological environment of the planet. ' <br />The "green revolution" of the 1960s and 1970s permitted another three to four generations of populati~~n ~n <br />the developil~g world to not only survive,bt~t'in many of these~countries, to improve their standard of hvin~' Thy; '~ <br />caused an i~~crease in the Ecolognr~IFogtpf~int on an ever-shrinking carrying capacity of the piznet. ~~ <br />It's lirii~~ h~~r ~~~nili~ ~nL~,~i~~tion~ ~~ui > >hba1, local, and individual 5~ale beginning ivhei~~ !~~F~i~r is tl~~~ ino~i.~ <br />in~~~.i~ i`.u~d t}it nu,,i nr~~d tr. ~h i>> ;i~ tilt, United Si,itr,: The 1re.~ht.~~f~~r ~~u~i~~ty r~mlin~ ~ ,_ <br />;, t~xtrc~, nn Lhi~ n~c~3. <br />~ I ~: ~ <br />' t <br />t <br />I~~e~~utit r Uii~~ctur <br />I-~®~v uc Spac=e Do Y®u ~CTse? <br />The Ecological Footprint Quiz, created by Redefin>11gProgress, is a scientifically-based tool that <br />allows individuals to calculate theamount t~f biologicallyproducti~°e land and sea area needed to <br />produce the resources they use and absorb the wastes thoyproduce. The .Ecological Footprint <br />measurement is also used to assess the impact of commututies, nations, and the world's population <br />as a whole. The quick anc~ easy 15-questzon Footprint Quiz can be found at: www.earthday.net <br />FACETS Summer 2002 <br />