Laserfiche WebLink
Shaping Development to Protect our ater <br />Land development and re-development projects are changing the landscape in our <br />increasingly_urbanwatcrshed. Paved and roofed areas speed up and increase the vol- <br />-- ume of rain~and snowmelt runoff. Uncontrolled construction site erosion can fil! , <br />lakes and streams~with silt: Polluted runoff from roads, parking lots, industrial sites and <br />residential lots add to water quality problems. Through careful planning, construction <br />practices and operating procedures, however, these problems can be avoided. <br />or minimized. <br />Permitting Program and <br />Cost-Share Incentives <br />The District's permitting program works to ensure <br />that development sites of one-acre or more properly <br />manage their stormwater runoff and prepare plans <br />for proper erosion and sediment control. District staff <br />inspects permit sites and enforces permits as need- <br />ed. The District works with interested developers to <br />include stormwater best management practices in <br />their project plans. <br />Beginning in 2003 the District is providing acost- <br />share incentive for cities and developers willing to <br />try cutting-edge techniques to reduce runoff volume <br />and improve water quality. This could include new <br />infiltration technologies to reduce runoff volumes or <br />runoff treatment to improve water quality. <br />Protecting Wetlands - <br />Forall the cities in the watershed, except St. Paul, <br />the District enforces the Minnesota Wetland <br />Conservation Act. The District reviews plans and <br />issues permits. for wetland filling or alteration. <br />Permits can be issued only if there is no way.to avoid <br />altering a wetland. Permit holders, most of whom are <br />developers, are required to create new wetland <br />habitat or restore old wetlands. The District contin- <br />ues to implement its 1997 Wetland Management <br />Plan, which classifies all wetlands Trite one of four <br />classes: Each class has stormwater treatment and <br />buffer requirements. <br />in 1998 the District helped evaluate the bene- <br />fits of an innovative parking lot design at the <br />H.By Fuller Company. The new parking lot <br />was designed to reduce and treat stormwa- <br />ter runoff, and prevent contaminants and <br />sediment from affecting nearby Willow Lake. <br />The parking lot surface slopes toward infil- <br />frationtrenches planted with wetland vege- <br />tation. <br />The trenches capture and filter stormwater <br />from the parking lot, allowing rain and <br />snowmelt to seep naturally into the ground. <br />The District study, partially funded by the <br />Metropo-itan Council, showed that 73 per- <br />cent less stormwater flowed off the site, <br />compared to a traditional parking lot design. <br />Research also determined that more than 94 <br />percent of sediment was removed from the <br />Sealing Abandoned Wells parking lot runoff -more than 500 pounds <br />The District's abandoned well sealing cost-share pro- per year. <br />gram is a strategy to~proteGt our groundwater. It is <br />estimated that there are hundreds of wells in the <br />watershed that are no longer being used or are in such <br />disrepair that their use is no longer practical. Many of these wells'are located on porous <br />rock structures where pollutants from the wells flr shallovV groundwater are more likely to <br />seep into the area's deeper aquifers. These wells are identified as "higf~ priority" and are <br />eligible fora 50 percent grant of up to $1,000 for sealing weAs. Since 1990, the District has <br />made approximately 770 grants-resulting in the sealing of over 800 wells. <br />9 <br />z,„' <br />~° -~< <br />Y~ <br />~~ <br />y.; <br />_ M1y~! <br />r. <br />;~:~~; <br />~., <br />3 <br />z <br />~~: <br />:~ <br />s <br />~: <br />~. <br />