Laserfiche WebLink
Permit 02-56; New Image Fitness - Vadnais Heights <br />The wetland onsite is currently classified as Protect. A site visit was made to verify the classification, at <br />which time staff determined that the Protect wetland classification was not appropriate. Instead, a <br />Manage 2 category was determined by staff to be the appropriate classification, with an associated <br />25-foot buffer requirement. The applicant is required to provide documentation that their current plans <br />meet this requirement. <br />Motion: Roger Lake moved, Bob Johnson seconded, to approve Permit #02-56. Motion carried. <br />Monthly Enforcement Report <br />During October, 11 notices were issued to address the following violations on permit sites: repair silt <br />fence (9), sweep streets (6), stabilize site and revegetate areas (2), repair inlet protection (5), and repair <br />rock construction entrance (4). <br />Ongoing enforcement issues:: New Century (Permit #99-OS), Townhomes of Oak Run Shores <br />(Permit #98-34), and wetland restoration at Tartan High School Phase 4 (Permit #02-09). <br />5. PROJECT STATUS REPORTS <br />Project Delays - CIP Maintenance/Repairs 2002, Battle Creek Lake Flood Protection Berm <br />Brad Lindaman handed out the Barr Engineering memo dated 11/6/02 that discusses potential damages <br />due to project delays. Jay Bros. is the contractor on both sites. Brad Lindaman stated that the <br />completion deadlines have passed on both projects, and he expressed concern that there appears to be no <br />sense of urgency on the part of the contractor to complete these projects. No formal requests for <br />extension have been submitted that require Board action at this time, but he asked them to consider the <br />issues outlined in the memo when that point in time occurs. <br />Cliff Aichinger advised the Board that they can deny the granting of any further extensions, demand <br />completion of the work by the contractor, if necessary hire another contractor to complete the work, and <br />assess the cost against any amounts due Jay Bros. The District will continue to incur additional <br />engineering and administrative costs until the project is completed. Some of the maintenance sites have <br />incurred erosion damage because they were left open too long and now require repair. District staff had <br />to postpone the shoreline restoration work on the berm until next year, and the plant material that was <br />ordered will likely be lost. Now that the District is incorporating natural resources elements into their <br />CIB projects, Cliff emphasized how critical it is for contractors to finish their work on time because the <br />window of time for planting is very limited. Bob Johnson wants staff to track this type of contractor <br />performance information so that it can be refen-ed to in the future as needed. <br />Tracey Galowitz was instructed to notify the contractor that they are past the completion date on these <br />two projects, to require the contractor to submit a plan of action within five business days, and to inform <br />the contractor that the District is not waiving their right to assess damages. <br />Valley Creek Road Stormwater Infiltration <br />John Toedt, Project Manager for Glenn Rehbein Excavating, was present to discuss his November 5`h <br />letter requesting a contract extension from September 30 to November 22, 2002. The Board also <br />received Brad's November 5`h memo that presents additional information for the Board's consideration. <br />The District will continue to incur additional engineering and administrative costs until the project is <br />completed. Approximately 75% of the site was seeded and mulched by October 27, which was outside <br />the seeding timeframe specified in the contract documents. Poor germination may occur as a result. <br />John Toedt fully acknowledged responsibility for the status of the project. The large amount of water <br />feeding into this area was not anticipated, and they have had to re-grade certain portions of the site at <br />least three times. They had to come up with a different approach to install the infiltration section, which <br />required importing coarse aggregate at a cost of $4,000 alone. He stated that the success of this project <br />is critical to his company, and they have a vested interest in making sure this technology works. <br />Page 2 November 6, 2002 RWMWD Minutes <br />