Laserfiche WebLink
street sweeping efforts and educational programs. Once the LMC guidebook comes together, he will plan on calling <br />together all the cities. <br />Water Quality Impact of Car Washing <br />Jen Oknich, District Intern, was assigned the task of doing a literature search in order to present the range of <br />scientific information on domestic car washing. The Board requested this information following the Stormwater <br />magazine article that was received on May 1. She was present to discuss her report entitled "The Perceived <br />Environmental Impact of Car Washing" dated 9/4/02. <br />Her report includes information collected on: <br />• Aniotic surfactants, the common ingredient in soap, which are very slow to biodegrade and have carcinogenic <br />and reproductively toxic by-products. <br />• Toxicity levels contained in the pollutants that are washed off of vehicles. <br />® Though many see it as a non-point source of pollution, the EPA has no restrictions on domestic car washing and <br />it is excluded from regulation due to a lack of funding. At the same time, they ha~~e placed a number of car <br />washes on the Superfund Site list, they have a wealth of information on vehicle washing BMPs, and NPDES <br />permits are required for commercial car washes. <br />• A summary table lists the actions taken by organizations and governmental units throughout the United States <br />and Canada, ranging from studies to public education programs to soap prohibition by city code. <br />~ Organizations who had enacted regulations were contacted but many could not substantiate the reasons behind <br />the regulation. <br />Paul Ellefson asked Jen if she thinks the District should be interested in the car washing issue. She believes there is <br />a definite impact to fish, and the District should stay abreast of the issue by doing more research. Perhaps a small <br />environmental education pamphlet could be developed, similar to a broad base educational program known as "River <br />Safe." <br />9. TREASURERS REPORT AND BILL LIST <br />Motion: Bob Johnson moved, Roger Lake seconded, to approve the Bill List and also the Supplemental Bill List for <br />October 2, 2002. Motion carried. <br />10. SPECIAL ORDERS <br />Well Sealing Resolution No. 02-11 <br />Motion: Roger Lake moved, Bob Johnson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 02-11 to approve cost share funding for <br />four well sealing program applications. Motion carried. <br />Proposed MAWD Annual Meeting Resolution <br />The Board considered a draft resolution entitled "Minnesota Watershed Research Program" in response to the need <br />for objective and scientifically sound research to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-benefit of existing and new <br />BMPs for water quality improvement and non-point source pollution reduction. The resolution would call for <br />MAWD to actively work towards the establishment of a Minnesota based research group, organization, or <br />collaboration, the establishment of an administrative structure and procedure for identifying priority research needs, <br />and development of an ongoing funding method. <br />Motion: Jack Frost moved, Bob Johnson seconded, to approve the Minnesota Watershed Research Program <br />resolution as presented and to forward it to the MAWD Policy/Resolutions Committee. Motion carried. <br />11. ADJOURNMENT <br />Motion: Jack Frost moved, seconded by Pam Skinner, to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m. The motion carried. <br />Respectfully submitted: <br />Robert Johnson, Secretary <br />Page 4 October 2, 2002 RWMWD Minutes <br />