My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-10-26_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-10-26_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2010 11:59:14 AM
Creation date
4/16/2010 11:37:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/26/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Step 5: Reconcile the hydrologic and phosphorus budgets to observed in-lake <br />conditions using a lake water quality model <br />Expected Cost: $18,110 <br />Lakes receive phosphorus loads from both external sources (stormwater runoff and atmospheric <br />deposition, primarily) and internal sources (recycle of plant- or sediment-bound phosphorus). While <br />stormwater runoff volumes and phosphorus loads will be estimated with P8, a separate model is <br />required for simulating the in-lake nutrient processes and resulting phosphorus budget of the lake. <br />An in-lake mass balance model developed by Barr will be used to estimate phosphorus <br />concentrations in Lake Owasso. The in-lake model takes into account the impacts of external <br />(watershed runoff, atmospheric deposition, septic systems, etc.) and internal phosphorus sources <br />(oxic and anoxic sediment-release, aquatic plant decay, rough fish, etc.) on the predicted in-lake <br />phosphorus concentration. The in-lake model can be calibrated by comparing the predicted <br />phosphorus concentrations in Lake Owasso with monitoring data and adjusting model parameters to <br />closely match monitored lake conditions. This partitioning of phosphorus sources allows for better <br />assessment of BMP benefits and more precise estimates of in-lake concentrations at various times <br />during the summer recreational period. <br />In order to accurately model the potential internal load of phosphorus that the lake receives from its <br />seasonally anoxic sediments, Barr will collect five sediment core samples from Lake Owasso. These <br />sediment cores will be analyzed for mobile-phosphorus, the fraction of sediment phosphorus that <br />may be recycled back into the water column, from anoxic lake sediments. This recycled phosphorus <br />generally becomes available for alga] uptake in the late-summer when thermal stratification breaks <br />down and the lake mixes. <br />Step 6: Using the lake model, assess likelihood of beneficial use attainment <br />under ultimate watershed land use conditions <br />Expected Cost: $3,050 <br />The calibrated P8 and in-lake models will be used to estimate phosphorus loads and lake phosphorus <br />concentrations assuming ultimate watershed land use conditions. Runoff and lake water quality <br />during wet, dry, and average precipitation conditions will be evaluated to better represent the full <br />range of possible climatic conditions. The estimated in-lake conditions will be used to determine the <br />future attainability of the established beneficial use goals. <br />Step 7: Recommend feasible alternative remedial measures <br />Expected Cost: $5,040 <br />If in-lake water quality modeling results suggest that water quality goals will not be attained under <br />ultimate watershed land use conditions, the water quality model will be used to predict the benefits of <br />implementing watershed or in-lake BMPs on Lake Owasso water quality. BMP alternatives will be <br />selected based on several factors, including characterization of the in-lake phosphorus budget (the <br />contribution of watershed versus internal phosphorus loads), hydrologic considerations (stormwater <br />Barr Engineering Company <br />:ODMA\PCDOCS\DOCS\247725\ I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.