Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville - Housing & Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes for January 20...Page 2 of 6 <br />b) <br /> Acceptance of 2003 year end report. <br />c) <br /> Approval of payment of legal fees with Krass Monroe for 4th Quarter 2003 in the amount of <br />$5,509.50. <br />d) <br /> Adoption of 2004 Calendar of Regularly Scheduled HRA Meetings. <br />e) <br />Adoption of contracts for legal, fiscal and staff services for 2004. <br />f) <br /> Set a Special Meeting of the HRA for January 29, 2004 at 7:00 p.m., Roseville Council <br />Chambers for the purpose of discussing the Twin Lakes Project and Stakeholder Panel Process. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Kelsey moved, seconded by Member Marks, to approve the consent <br />agenda items 6.a. ā€“ 6.f. as presented. <br /> <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />  <br />Action Items <br />7. <br /> <br />a) Approval of Bylaws & Election of Officers of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority in <br />and for the City of Roseville for 2004. <br /> <br /> <br />Motion: Member Kelsey moved, seconded by Member Scheunemann to approve by <br />resolution as attached the HRA Bylaws & Election of Officers as follows of the Housing & <br />Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Roseville for 2004: <br /> <br /> <br />Chair: Bill Majerus <br />Vice Chair: Jen Jackson Millasovich <br />Secretary: Sam Marks <br />Executive Director: Cathy Bennett <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />  <br />b)  Selection of Housing Designs for 5 Applewood Pointe Single Family Homes. <br /> <br />Executive Director Cathy Bennett provided an overview of the five home designs on lots owned <br />by the HRA. The contractor for the project will be the GMHC. Ramsey County provided <br />$191,000 for the project on Lots 1, 2 and 4. These lots will have Ramsey County income limits. <br />The designs have been proposed by GMHC (2 for corners and 4 for interior lots). Lots 3 and 6 <br />are owned by Habitat for Humanity. She explained the role of the review panel for the designs. <br />The size and design criteria were coordinated with the Applewood Pointe design concepts. A <br />general discussion of the design ensued. Plan ā€œCā€ was agreed to by consensus being charming <br />and less dominated by the garage in front. A front roof extension makes the entrance seem <br />minimal. Bill Buelow of GMHC explained that a side sitting area may be proposed. Landscaping <br />is minimal in the design but may be expanded. The budget for these housing units will be based <br />on an s.f. cost ā€“ approximately $90/s.f. Member Kelsey encouraged proven, but newer <br />construction techniques. Member Scheunemann discussed and encouraged poured-in-form <br />concrete basement walls with R-35 walls. (Habitat has used this construction method). <br /> <br />On the interior lots staff recommended from A, E, F, D, plans A and E. Plan A needs either a <br />rear bay window or deck and a mudroom. Pillars are to match Applewood. Plan E is an option <br />that shows a four bedroom house. Member Kelsey preferred Plan F for the first floor variety; the <br />http://archive.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/hra/minutes/2004/hram040120.htm4/16/2010 <br /> <br />