Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 22, 2010 <br />Page 18 <br />Mr. Schwartz repeatedly expressed the Department's appreciation of the City <br />Council's support in implementing programs, despite resource challenges; and <br />expressed the Department's support for performance measurement and program <br />budgeting, noting that the Public Works Department had been tracking. their <br />budget allocations since the 1980's in such a way, allowing for greater efficiency. <br />Mr. Schwartz sited the City's Pavement Management Plan (PMP) as a prime ex- <br />ample and its performance to-date, and the public's perception of the city's infra- <br />structure, trails and sidewalks as mentioned in the Imagine Roseville 2025 docu- <br />ment. Mr. Schwartz concurred with Mr. Brokke's comment related to the quality <br />and commitment of current staff in his department as well, each committed to <br />productivity and efficiency. <br />Mr. Schwartz addressed additional work and resources for Pathway Master Plan <br />work; facility maintenance and replacement; environmental protection enhance- <br />ments; coordination with items in the Parks Master Plan process as they include <br />Public Works-related items; and ongoing transit connection improvements to take <br />advantage of other projects in the metropolitan area (i.e., Central Corridor plan- <br />ning). <br />Mr. Schwartz addressed specific Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) issues for 2010 <br />through 2019, with approximately $55,000,000 of the total $100 million related to <br />Public Works in one way or another; the success of the PMP program, unique in <br />how it funds long-term maintenance; increased construction costs projected due to <br />increased energy costs; and consideration in the future of additional levy dollars <br />to support the PMP program and/or review of the existing Assessment Policy to <br />ensure its stability. <br />Mr. Schwartz reviewed current low bids received for 2010 projects at approx- <br />imately twenty percent (20%) under the engineer's estimate and benefits to resi- <br />dents in getting street rehabilitation without assessment; utility rehabilitation <br />and/or replacement to take advantage of projects (i.e., Rice Street reconstruction) <br />to replace infrastructure at the lowest cost possible; improved technology creating <br />additional efficiencies; need to continue a systematic replacement of the City's <br />50+ year old utility infrastructure; and progress being made in replacing water- <br />mains over the last few years in the City's most problematic areas. Mr. Schwartz <br />reviewed projects coming up in the immediate future; average three miles of street <br />rehabilitation annually; and facility standards to facilitate the most cost-effective <br />operations and maintenance. <br />Mr. Schwartz briefly reviewed the upcoming challenges for the department as it <br />related to facilities, pathways, and full implementation of the City's Pathway <br />Master Plan in the future. <br />