Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 22, 2010 <br />Page 19 <br />Discussion included the need to consider long-term maintenance of the pathway <br />system, not just construction and/or replacement; prioritization of the Pathway <br />Master Plan, last reviewed and updated in 2008 with no dedicated fund in place <br />and no reprioritization at that time; taking advantage of opportunities as they arise <br />and are included in related area projects, and when grants for those specific areas <br />become available. <br />Ms. Bloom and Mr. Schwartz addressed the number of smaller pathway connec- <br />tions and/or improvements made over the last few years, with the Rice Street cor- <br />ridor being another major priority. Ms. Bloom estimated that current indications <br />are that the City may be a minimum of 25% through the priority list, with no oth- <br />ers on the horizon at this time due to a lack of funding sources. <br />Councilmembers requested that staff provide more definitive information to the <br />City Council with actual numbers. <br />Further discussion included the need for neighborhood connections not currently <br />on the Pathway Master Plan list at this time; needed connections between multi- <br />family buildings and bus stops; and additional coordination by staff with other <br />agencies to enhance pedestrian safety near parks or at connection points. <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested additional staff information on the cost for addi- <br />tional striping on County roads and/or signage at crosswalks and related costs to <br />enhance pedestrian safety, specifically near parks. <br />Councilmember Roe requested additional staff information on costs for additional <br />right-of--way maintenance on state and/or county roadways where additional <br />maintenance was indicated or preferred to improve the City's aesthetics. <br />In conclusion, Ms. Bloom reviewed a number of regulator mandates increasing <br />staffls work load, including MPCA permitting and education on the MS4 Permit <br />and Illicit Discharge ordinance; erosion control; Total Maximum Daily Load stu- <br />dies as part of Watershed Districts and implementation projects to reduce that <br />loading; attempts to improve storm water drainage issues and elimination of the <br />infiltration/inflow surcharge through acity-wide program; FEMA mapping for <br />flood plains with an ordinance scheduled to come before the City Council in the <br />near future for implementation by June of 2010; updating storm design frequen- <br />cies and cycles; and areas of partnership, coordination and advise involving staff <br />participation with other communities and/or agencies. Ms. Bloom further re- <br />viewed ADA inventory requirements for crosswalks and implementation of timed <br />and audible crossing signals; and staffing challenges in providing assistance to <br />residents for rain garden installations, with staff fielding between 30-60 inquires <br />annually, and needing education and outreach to encourage such community en- <br />thusiasm and interest. <br />