CC_Minutes_2010_0426 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, Apri126, 2010 Page 11 Mr. Munson summarized the proposed abatement and estimated costs, consisting of removal of garbage stored in bags in the yard or on the driveway at an approx- imately one-time total cost of $250.00; previous City Council directive; and staffls attempts to resolve the situation in accordance with their directive: Mr. Munson noted that staff could not locate and/or contact the property owner, Carol Armstrong, even after repeated efforts, and advised that one of the adjacent neighbors, in attendance tonight, indicated that the property was a rental and not owner-occupied since approximately 2006. Staff recommended that the Community Development Department be authorized to abate the unresolved City Code violations as detailed as aone-time action, and if not resolving the situation, returning to the City Council with further recom- mendation. Discussion included the process staff would follow in attempting to resolve this recurring situation for the long-term; the concerns in lack of resolution of this is- sue and apparent lack of interest of the property owner in its resolution; directing staff to send notices to the property owner as well as "occupant;" how to resolve the issue permanently, not just on a one-time basis; incentives for compliance by the occupant and/or property owner; further attempts to research the current ad- dress of the property owner; and the process in issuing a Ramsey Court citation with City Attorney Gaughan outlining such a criminal citation. Mayor Klausing noted that the property owner and/or occupant was currently in violation of City ordinance and needed to show their willingness to cooperate to avoid further recourse, and admonished that this situation was not acceptable. Neighbor, Laura Florhaug, 1740 Galtier Street Ms. Florhaug confirmed that Ms. Armstrong no longer lived in the home, which was currently occupied by Ms. Joy Hayden and her two daughters; and expressed concern that Ms. Armstrong was not receiving the notices and opined that she would be responsive if she had received them. Ms. Forhaug expressed concern with how incentives could be provided to resolve the situation; further expressing her frustration in this ongoing problem, and their personal expense in installing blinds and a fence to alleviate the eyesore from their property's view. Discussion included unpaid property taxes and forfeiture; how to enforce com- pliance; difficulty in communication with the current occupants; other nuisance issues for this occupant including lack of maintenance (snow shoveling) and dogs running wild and defecating in other yards; and lack of refuse service at this ad- dress.