Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, Apri126, 2010 <br />Page 16 <br />Further discussion included the frequency and type of data available for residents <br />and the City in managing the water system; rationale for meter replacement sche- <br />duling; incremental funding for the project; and normal replacement cycle of me- <br />ters throughout the City. <br />Johnson moved, Klausing seconded, authorization of the implementation plan for <br />a Neptune fixed-base, two-way Automated Meter Reading (AMR) system. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Johnson; Roe; Pust; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />h. Approve Extension for St. Paul Water Services Approval of Concrete Recy- <br />cling as an Interim Use at the Dale Street Reservoir <br />Mayor Klausing referenced an e-mail received earlier today from Judith and Da- <br />vid Thoreson, 1870 Alta Vista Drive, related to this item and distributed as a <br />bench handout. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the RCA dated Apri126, 2010 requesting <br />an extension of the Interim Use for concrete recycling at this site due to contract <br />delays during the contract award process. Mr. Paschke advised that staff had pro- <br />vided notice of the requested extension and tonight's discussion to those property <br />owners first receiving notice of the original request for the Planning Commission <br />public hearing as well as City Council consideration. Mr. Paschke advised that <br />staff supported and recommended the extension; however, noted that staff had re- <br />ceived anumber of a-mail comments related to operation of the concrete recy- <br />cling process. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that, to his knowledge, there was not a representative present <br />from Saint Paul Regional Water Services. <br />Discussion included options available and implications of those other options <br />(i.e., hauling concrete off-site versus on-site recycling); mitigation options for the <br />crushing operation itself; and impacts if the extension is not approved. <br />Further discussion included why the operation was delayed and why the process <br />was taking longer than anticipated; the requested extension of four weeks; status <br />of the park trail and access, in addition to signage by the applicant; detriment of <br />additional truck traffic, dust and noise by off-site resolution; and conditions of the <br />original Interim Use. <br />Mayor Klausing, while not happy about the extension, questioned whether deny- <br />ing it served the interests of the residents any better. <br />