My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0412
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2010 1:47:50 PM
Creation date
5/18/2010 1:47:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/12/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 12, 2010 <br />Page 10 <br />and divisions; park types; park components; base levels of park components in <br />each park; components in every constellation; community/sector components; and <br />major components. Mr. Schroeder described the "constellation" concept used to <br />identify specific parks and their deficiencies, identified through ten minute walk <br />areas around each of the neighborhood areas, and used several examples in vari- <br />ous areas of the community, building on the original parks Master Plan completed <br />in the 1960's. Mr. Schroeder reviewed the spread sheets included in the agenda <br />packet identifying amenities and available resources at each constellation, with <br />those maps and spreadsheets now available for the next step in determining how <br />to deliver programs and use them for tracking investments and implementation <br />activities at each constellation. <br />Mr. Schroeder noted that the next steps would be the Concept Planning Design <br />Charettes scheduled for May 19 and June 2 to develop concepts that reflect across <br />seven different zones in the community, and provided the rationale in choosing <br />those particular seven parks, based on specific criteria. <br />Further items overviewed in the presentation included the public input process it- <br />self; identification of several areas needing further studies; and value-based versus <br />statistically valid input or a combination of both to proceed toward implementa- <br />tion. <br />Councilmembers recognized and thanked members of the Work Group for their <br />time and commitment to the process, as well as that of Roseville citizens for their <br />participation. <br />Discussion among Councilmembers and members of the Work Group included, <br />potential planning at Langton Park; walking connections within the constellations <br />and linking them to each other and other areas and amenities in the community <br />working from the neighborhood outward, with the Public Works view working <br />from the regional transportation perspective back to the community; definition of <br />existing and/or planned trails and those areas where nothing is planned; and loop- <br />ing them for identification as recreational opportunities as well. <br />Further discussion included making the community walkable; inclusion of com- <br />mercial venues in town and addressing them, through discussion and coordination <br />with members of the business community for their perspective, with the role of <br />pathways, private parks or park-like facilities; or partnering with businesses for <br />those amenities in business-oriented areas (i.e., pocket parks). <br />Mr. Brokke noted the interest in performing a statistically valid survey and/or <br />needs assessment closer to the implementation stage to determine if the informa- <br />tion developed during the process matched or was consistent.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.