Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix A <br />Individual household recovery rates may increase (more recyclable materials <br />set out and less trash) affecting the relative composition of the recycling <br />stream; <br />More "non-targeted materials" may be set out by residents for recycling; <br />The collection crews may not inspect the recycling bins at truck-side for non- <br />targeted materials (if lidded carts are loaded with semi-automatic or automatic <br />lifting devices on board the curbside recycling vehicles); <br />Once delivered to a MRF, the relative percent and absolute tons of "processing <br />residuals" output for disposal may increase; <br />^ Once sorted and processed at the MRF, the individual recyclable commodities <br />(e.g., bales of newspaper, aluminum cans, etc.) may have more or less <br />"contaminants" depending on MRF design, management and operations; <br />and/or <br />There may be more or less glass breakage throughout the collection and <br />processing stages such that the relative output of color-sorted glass vs. color- <br />mixed, broken glass changes. <br />Beyond "processing residuals", other potential environmental and health impacts of <br />collection system changes include: <br />Overall or "net" recovery of recyclable material (i.e., more or less tons actually <br />recycled); <br />Efficiency of collections (e.g., change in curbside truck payloads, routing, <br />etc.); <br />Worker health and safety (e.g., manual vs. automated lifting; centralized <br />processing requiring manual sorting, etc.); and <br />Composition of recyclables, commodities products, and processing residuals. <br />Because independent, actual field measurements were not conducted as a part of the <br />Roseville pilot project, this analysis does not empirically quantify the "process <br />residuals" but rather discusses the available data as reported in other studies. Also, the <br />t' 1' 1;.,,,~ 11;,,0.7 .7 a ~;,.,,,, ~ « ~...~t,.._ t a <br />pviiCy iiiipiiCa~ivuo are vuuui~.u aitu re~.oiiuiieiiuauvuJ tvl 1U1111G1 researlj111te1111GGU. <br />Standard Definitions - Currently the recycling industry lacks standardized <br />definitions. This is one of the key barriers to professional dialogue about designing <br />studies to measure impacts of changes to single-stream recycling programs. The <br />following set of terms is proposed to the City and Ramsey County as a basis for such <br />discussion (see Attachment A-1 for a more thorough set of proposed definitions and <br />examples.) <br />"Non-Targeted Materials" -Materials that are defined by the municipality as <br />not acceptable but are routinely included by residents in their curbside bins. <br />"Processing Residuals" -Materials that are disposed as-mixed solid waste as <br />an unwanted by-product after processing of recyclables at MRFs. <br />A-2 Bi6os <br />