My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-05-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-05-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2010 9:37:14 AM
Creation date
5/24/2010 9:24:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/25/2010
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Analysis of Processing Residuals <br />"Contaminants in Marketed Product" - Outthrows and prohibitives as <br />defined for specific commodities and grades by each end market (i.e., mills or <br />other manufacturing plants that utilize processed recyclable materials). <br />If these terms are clearly defined and reported, the recycling industry will be able to <br />better compare research results. The actual composition, sources, and systematic <br />causes of increased processing residuals will be better understood. Also, through <br />improved communications and professional research, public and private management <br />controls will become more feasible and accepted as "best practices". Thus, <br />standardized definitions should be a first step if reducing the amount of processing <br />residuals is a top priority for both municipalities and private contractors regardless if <br />the collection system is dual-stream or single-stream. <br />as fro a City o oseville eccli ilo <br />roes <br />A comprehensive recyclable materials composition analysis was conducted as part of <br />the overall City pilot project. One of the key indicators of effectiveness measured for <br />each collection method was the amount of non-targeted material collected. The non- <br />targeted material was divided into four subcategories: <br />Beer, Pop & Water Boxes <br />^ Other Paper Trash <br />Plastic Bags and Other Film Plastic <br />Other Trash <br />The composition analysis team used a simple standard for determining if a <br />questionable item should be sorted into the non-targeted material: "If the City public <br />education tools list the item under Don't include these items' (in youY cuYbside <br />recycling bin), then the sampled item was placed in one of the non-targeted material <br />subcategories. For example "beer, pop & water boxes" were defined as non-targeted <br />materials because the City staff instructs residents who call to exclude these coated <br />("wet strength") boxes from their recyclable materials set at the curb. <br />The Project Team's data analysis of the City's recyclable materials composition sorts <br />(Appendix B of this report) compared the material compositions by weight of the <br />single-stream collection routes to the dual-stream routes during the pilot. The results <br />showed the percentages of non-targeted materials (contaminants) in the single-stream <br />routes were higher than the percentages of non-targeted materials found in the dual- <br />stream routes. <br />Summary of WM Study at its Minneapolis MRF <br />Waste Management, Inc. (WM) conducted a composition analysis at its Twin Cities <br />MRF located in Minneapolis. The study, titled Summary -Single-Sort Constituent <br />s~~os A-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.