CC_Minutes_2010_0510 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, May 10, 2010 Page 14 • James Addition Neighborhood Master Plan Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy Twin Lakes Business Park Master Plan Cornerstone Neighborhood Mixed Use Project Report Arona-Hamline Neighborhood Master Plan McCarran's Neighborhood Master Plan Mr. Trudgeon reviewed the filters used by staff in making their recommendation in determining which, if any, master plans created prior to 2009 should be in- cluded in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan or if it adequately addressed them (i.e., Page 11-7, Using the Plan), as indicated on Attachment A to the RCA. Ms. Radel reviewed each specific master plan, the year it was produced, its defini- tion, recommendation and comments, as detailed in Attachment B to the RCA. Councilmember Ihlan questioned whether the original recommendations of the James Addition Study shouldn't be included in the Comprehensive Plan narra- tives. City Engineer Debra Bloom advised that over the last ten years, the James Addi- tion Study had been worked through and most items acted upon, as was the origi- • nal intent of the study when the City knew that the access was going to close and their rationale for the study to consider additional access points; with items either implemented as envisioned, or now obsolete. Councilmember Ihlan referenced a page from the City of Bloomington's land use comprehensive plan, and suggested it was a good model to ensure future decision- makers remained aware of the master plans. Mayor Klausing requested that staff provide copies to the remaining Council- members for their review and future consideration. Councilmember Roe clarified the original intent in the City Council addressing existing master plans, and whether any of those existing plans had content need- ing to be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, with three different options: by reference, by updating their content to include key points of the master plan, or by adopting more specific points into the land use section. Councilmember Roe opined that it would appear that recommendation for that threshold action had been adequately addressed through staff's analysis, and further opined the only potential future questions may relate to the Twin Lakes Master Plan in the future, but currently adequately addressed. Discussion included staff's analysis that the Comprehensive Plan contained suffi- • cient criteria and reference to the master plans; and inclusion of traffic plans and