CC_Minutes_2010_0510 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

exempt entity. Given the amount of tax revenue already given away to Northwestern College, it hardly seems appropriate to vacate even more of our prime tax base. Our City Council and staff are constantly saying "we can't do anything but allow this," "we have no authority to turn down this request.'' These statements, while not always accurate, are often because of too weakly or broadly written portions of our Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Code. If these policies are closely written and tightly monitored, the Council would much more often be able to easily act in the best interests and majority wishes of the residents. Furthermore, the staff would have more accurate guidelines when working with potential developers. In discussing this proposed change, the City Council should consider the potential for inappropriate mixing of business and institutional facilities in commercial districts. This could potentially lead to sex shops, liquor stores, or pawn shops next to charter schools, day care centers, high schools or nursing homes. These issues, while currently hypothetical, under the proposed revisions could become difficult situations and ones in which the staff and City Council might be unable to avoid. I would like to propose that our Comprehensive Plan, less than one year old, remain as currently written and that the Zoning Code follow closely the desires spelled out in the Comprehensive Plan. When a proposal that is broadly supported by the community and economically beneficial to the community comes forward, the City Council should then and only then consider an exception for that specific proposal. To broaden and generalize what we have would be to simply open a "pandora's box" of development with no opportunity for residents or the Council to take appropriate action to deny or severely limit an inappropriate or detrimental proposal. I would like to offer several ideas for consideration. That a policy for payment in lieu of taxes be established for private institutions and religious institutions within Roseville and that it be stated plainly documents and impressed on all developers and proposers. That the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code remain very tight to allow the City Council to respond appropriately to proposals that are not in the best economic interest of the residents or which are not broadly supported by the residents. That staff be given better guidelines regarding appropriate proposals so that those that are inappropriate are not brought before the Council or sought by staff. That any change(s) to the Comprehensive Plan be undertaken annually at a specific time and that residents are well notified and encouraged to participate in discussions and the process of any changes. This is an extremely important document that should not be changed, even with a 4/5 majority, without significant public notification. Setting an "annual time certain" and specific process would remove any need for additional notification. Any petitioner for change could easily wait, but would know in advance that nothing would be done until the "annual meeting." Thank you for your consideration. z