My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0614
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0614
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2010 11:50:41 AM
Creation date
7/9/2010 11:50:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/14/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 14, 2010 <br />Page 5 <br />handling and quarantines restricting movements; planting of a diverse mixture of <br />trees to avoid future catastrophic loss; as well as providing additional educational <br />opportunities for staff and the public. <br />Mr. Brokke noted realities of the EAB issue related to current limited city fore- <br />stry-related resources; and 2010 grant/budget, and 2011 budget; potential funding <br />sources, with Preparedness received in 2010 in the amount of $50,000 for a public <br />tree inventory to be completed by May of 2011; and a limited amount of remov- <br />al/replacement; need for reallocation of existing city funds or additional revenue; <br />cost-share with homeowners; and partnering/sharing with other cities. <br />City Manager Malinen clarified that the golf course had treated their Ash trees by <br />pesticides at a cost of $600 total; and Mr. Brokke estimated that the cost per tree <br />for annual treatment would be $120 per tree. <br />Discussion among Councilmembers and staff included the effectiveness of a pes- <br />ticide treatment rather than complete removal of the trees, with limited data avail- <br />able to-date, but indicating limited success; anticipated completion of the City's <br />tree inventory by the end of summer; average cost of removing a mature tree de- <br />pending on size estimated at $1200 per tree; and staff estimating that Ash trees <br />represented approximately 25% of the City's tree inventory. <br />Councilmember Pust suggested that the City's Code Enforcement staff, complet- <br />ing the annual Neighborhood Enhancement Program (NEP) incorporate and pin- <br />point locations of Ash trees to further facilitate the inventory, and while walking <br />certain areas of the City. Councilmember Pust noted that, in a recent seminar she <br />had attended in New Brighton, they estimated that their community had 3,000 <br />Ash trees. <br />Further discussion included how previous tree disasters (i.e., Dutch Elm disease) <br />had been paid for; availability of a software program to document the tree inven- <br />tory data and to provide cost calculators for additional data; impacts and cost- <br />sharing options for Ash trees on private property; impacts to compromised trees <br />as well as healthy ones with the average life expectancy of Ash trees at 20-30 <br />years; and the City's accountability for stockpiled wood and/or destruction as per <br />state directives. <br />11. Public Hearings <br />12. Business Items (Action Items) <br />13. Business Items - Presentations/Discussions <br />a. Continue Discussions on the 2011- 2020 Capitallnvestment Plan (CIP) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.