My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_10824
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
10xxx
>
10800
>
res_10824
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2010 1:32:43 PM
Creation date
7/9/2010 1:30:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Meeting Date
6/28/2010
Resolution #
10824
Resolution Title
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION MONOPOLE FACILITY ON THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY AT 2489-2499 RICE STREET AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH §1014.01 OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE (PF10-010)
Resolution Date Passed
6/28/2010
Planning File #
10010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. Any future ground equipment shall be screened consistent with the zoning <br />requirements in effect at that time; <br />c. The top of the proposed monopole tower shall not be higher than 125 feet above <br />the grade at the base of the structure; <br />d. The monopole and all ground equipment shall be painted or otherwise colored to <br />blend with the surroundings as much as possible; <br />e. Any wiring serving the equipment shall be buried; <br />f. External lights (i.e., those not integral to the equipment itself) shall not be <br />installed on the tower or equipment; and <br />g. Prior to installing equipment, all service providers shall submit documentation <br />demonstrating that the telecommunication equipment will operate within the <br />technical requirements of the Federal Communications Commission. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Johnson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Johnson, Pust, <br />Roe, and Klausing; <br />and Ihlan voted against. <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.