My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_1116_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_1116_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 3:27:44 PM
Creation date
8/9/2010 4:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
building would be within this limit because it would not exceed the approximately 1,140- <br />square-foot footprint of the principal structure (which does not have an attached garage). <br />� 6.5 The land area of the subject property is approximately 17,000 square feet; � 1017.2651 <br />� (Impervious Coverage in Shoreland Management Districts) of the City Code permits up <br />� to 4,250 square feet of impervious coverage on a lot this size located within 300 feet of <br />� Langton Lake. If the proposed garage were constructed, impervious coverage on the <br />� property might exceed the 25% m�imum; the excess can be eliminated by removing <br />� some existing pavement or it can be accommodated and mitigated through the <br />� Administrative Deviation process. Planning Division staff does not recommend <br />� additional conditions of approval because impervious surface area is regulated by normal <br />� Code requirements from which the applicant is not seeking to deviate. <br />� 6.6 All of the above Code requirements work together to allow the proposed structure, but <br />� this one building will utilize the m�imum extent of such allowances and preclude the <br />� construction of any other accessory buildings on the property. <br />1 6.% REVIEW OF STANDARD CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA <br />� a. Section 1013.01 (Conditional Uses) of the City Code requires the Planning <br />� Commission and City Council to consider the following criteria when reviewing a <br />� coNDiT1oNAL usE application: <br />� i. Impact on traffic; <br />� ii. Impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; <br />� iii. Compatibility of the site plan, internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and <br />� structures with contiguous properties; <br />� iv. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; <br />� v. Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; and <br />� vi. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />� b. Impact on traffic: The Planning Division has determined that an increase in traffic <br />� volume, due to the size of the proposed 1,008-square-foot accessory structure on the <br />� property, will not be an issue given that the building will be used to meet the daily <br />� and seasonal storage needs of a residential property owner and thus will not be <br />� creating a destination for commercial or additional residential traffic. <br />� c. Impact on parks, streets and other public facilities: The Planning Division has <br />� determined that the proposed accessory structure is unrelated to the City's parks, <br />� streets, and other facilities, and so will not have an adverse impact on them. <br />� d. Compatibility ... with contiguous properties: The proposed accessory structure <br />� would not change the circulation on the property since it is essentially replacing the <br />� previous garage; a site plan is included with this staff report as Attachment D. Of the <br />� 5 contiguous properties, only two others appear to have accessory structures, one of <br />� which is about 600 square feet and the other seems to approach the 864-square-foot <br />� limit; other detached buildings in the area, however, range from small garden sheds to <br />� larger accessory structures, including one that is nearly 1,100 square feet. Although <br />� the proposed building is larger than those found on the contiguous properties and <br />would not be screened from the neighbor to the north, the larger building would allow <br />PF09-033 RCA 111609.doc <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.