2009_1116_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

�. some of what has been stored outside on the property to be located inside the new � 4 structure, reducing the perception of clutter. � 4 e. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties: Although the � 4 current proposal seeks coNDiT1oNAL usE approval to build the largest accessory � E structure allowed on a single-family residential property, the Planning Division has � E determined that the proposed building is unlikely to have an adverse impact on the � E value of contiguous properties if windows are installed along the north and south �E sides to visually break up the longer-than-normal wall facing the adjacent property. � E f. Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare: The Planning Division � E believes that the proposed accessory building will have no impact on the general � E public health, safety, and welfare. � E g. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan: An accessory structure is a � E permitted use (and the proposed accessory building is a conditionally permitted use) �E in the R-1 Single-Family Residence District and is compatible with the �; Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Low-Density Residential. 1 � 6.g REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL CRITERIA PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USES IN SHORELAND 1 � MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS �; a. Section 1017.21 (Conditional Uses in Shoreland Management Districts) of the City �; Code requires the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the following �; additional criteria when reviewing a coNDiT1oNAL usE application for properties �; within a shoreland management district: �; i. The prevention of soil erosion or other possible pollution of public waters, �; both during and after construction; �; ii. The visibility of structures ... as viewed from public waters is limited; �f iii. The types, uses, and numbers of watercraft that the project will generate can � f be safely accommodated on the site; and � f iv. The impact the proposed use may have on the water quality of the water body � f is not excessive. � f b. The prevention of soil erosion ... during and after construction: Measures to � f prevent soil erosion during construction are required, as necessary, as part of the � f building permit review process. Secause the proposed accessory structure is to � f replace a previous structure located about 200 feet from the nearest part of Langton � f Lake, which is on the opposite side of a public street, the Planning Division believes � f that a 1,008-square-foot building will have no greater erosion or pollution impacts on �� the public water than a building that does not require coNDiT1oNAL usE approval. �� c. The visibility of structures ... is limited: If the proposed accessory building meets �� all of the Code's size and other design requirements, it would not have a front �� elevation that is different than a permitted structure, and any structures on this �� property will be substantially (if not completely) screened by the mature trees and �� other vegetation on the eastern side of Langton Lake. For these reasons, the Planning �� Division has determined that a 1,008-square-foot accessory structure will not be unusually or undesirably visible from the public water. PF09-033 RCA 111609.doc Page 6 of 8