My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0726
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0726
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2010 10:26:15 AM
Creation date
8/16/2010 10:24:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/26/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 26, 2010 <br />Page 5 <br />City Attorney Bartholdi advised that it was indeed broader than those limitations <br />under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466; and noted that the property owner had <br />been asked to comply with limits set forth in State Statute, but they had refused. <br />Mr. Bartholdi advised that it was the consensus of his office and staff that the in- <br />surance provided by the contractor would make up any difference for the short pe- <br />riod of time between the right-of--entry and the City's acquisition of the property. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her opposition to the City taking on additional <br />liability. <br />Councilmember Pust expressed her opposition to setting a precedent in waiving <br />the City's statutory limits of liability. <br />In response to Mayor Klausing's request for other available options, City Attor- <br />ney Bartholdi advised that a hearing was scheduled yet this month asking the <br />court to order a Quick Take of the property for earlier access to the property. <br />Economic Development Associate Jamie Radel advised that this action had been <br />requested by the City to facilitate the most expedient way to move forward with <br />the construction process, noting that the sooner the contractor could access the <br />parcels, the sooner construction could be initiated and completed. Ms. Radel <br />noted that, during the bidding process, contractors were made aware of the mid- <br />August access to the property and had included that provision in determining the <br />timetable for the construction process; however, she noted that this earlier access <br />would facilitate them better. <br />Discussion included the City retaining the right to bring subrogation actions <br />against any contractors and/or subcontractors if there was any liability action <br />brought against the City as a responsible party, if such a provision was included in <br />the contracts between the City and contractors; clarification that this agreement <br />was being sought by the property owner, not the contractor; and provisions of <br />Minnesota Statute 466 limiting the City's liability to $1.5 million. <br />At the request of City Manager Malinen, Public Works Director Duane Schwartz <br />advised that he didn't recall specifically the limits of insurance required from the <br />contractor in their contracts with the City for this project; however he suspected <br />that if there was any liability claim exceeding $1.5 million, they would be re- <br />quired to indemnify the City. Mr. Schwartz suggested deferring action on this re- <br />quest until the August 9, 2010 Council meeting for confirmation by staff of this <br />provision; and noted that this strip of land was very narrow and the contractor had <br />plenty of work to do outside the confines of this property that would keep them <br />mobilized until additional research was completed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.