Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(1) The Village Council finds the application <br />for the amended special use permit has inferior parking plans <br />and further finds that the service bays heretofore designed in <br />the rear of the building now are de signed so a s they are oriented <br />towards County Road liB", and the Courcil further finds that <br />these variations make the use inconsistent with surrounding <br />properties. <br /> <br />(2) Based upon the findings of the Council, <br />the application for amended special use permit heretofore <br />granted is hereby denied. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was <br />duly seconded by Member ^nderson and upon a vote being held <br />thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Grauel, ^nderson and \1011 <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />Curley and Linebarrer <br /> <br />WHEREUPON, the said Resolution was declared duly <br />pas sed and adopted. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA) <br />) <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) <br /> <br />I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and action Manager <br />of the Village of Roseville, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have <br />carefully compared the attached and foregOing extract of minutes of a <br />regular meeting of the Village Council of the Village of Roseville, Minnesota, <br />held on the 11th day of May, 1970, with the original on file in my office, <br />and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as <br />the same relates to denying Murphy On Corporation the application for <br />amended special use permit. <br /> <br />WITNESS my hand as such Manager and the corporat~ seal of <br />the Village Council of Roseville, Minnesota, this llth day of/May, 1~7 O. <br />-) / I: <br /> <br />I I I <br />/ I' I . <br />i' \\., 'I, I' <br />Burke M. R.aymon' ' <br /> <br />(S E A L) <br />