My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-07-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-07-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2010 3:28:45 PM
Creation date
8/19/2010 3:14:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/27/2010
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
However, Mr. Toogood recognized the associated costs that would require <br />relocation of the signal pole and right-of--way issues at this MnDOT-controlled <br />intersection. <br />Discussion included lane change issues within signal light timing allowances. <br />Mr. Schwartz suggested that Ramsey County be enlisted by City staff to evaluate <br />the timing of the signal at that intersection to see if an additional few seconds <br />would alleviate some problems. <br />#7 Snelling and Hamline Avenues <br />Ms. Bloom noted that this intersection was controlled by the jurisdictions of <br />Ramsey County and the City of Arden Hills. <br />#8 -County Road B-2 and Lexin t~ on (eastbound <br />Ms. Bloom noted previous discussion in seeking review of the signage at this <br />intersection for ashort-term solution; with staff requesting that Ramsey County <br />review this intersection as part of any future Highway 36 bridge discussions. <br />Mr. Toogood and members concurred that this intersection be put on the bottom <br />of the list of priorities. <br />0 - Snelling Avenue and County Road C-2 <br />oom noted that a right turn lane would require street widening and be <br />;ely cost-prohibitive due to relocation of the signal; and that staff would <br />under consideration as part of any future projects. <br />Discussion included impacts to pedestrians with the addition of an additional lane; <br />and availability of space for a sidewalk on the north side of County Road C-2. <br />#11 - Woodhill & Lexington Avenues <br />Ms. Bloom suggested ashort-term solution by posting signs showing "lane ends" <br />on the east side of the intersection. Ms. Bloom noted that a mill and overlay was <br />scheduled for this street in 2014, and that improved and re-aligned striping, <br />moving the parking lane and shortening it to the east, could be considered as <br />alternatives at that time. <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.