Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 13, 2010 <br />Page 6 <br />hearing and the staff presentation prior to opening the hearing. Ms. Radel advised <br />that staff s recommendation was for creation of TIF District 19 in order to provide <br />financial assistance for the development of Phase I of the Applewood Pointe se- <br />nior housing cooperative, based on policy direction and public purposes within <br />the City for implementation of the Twin. lakes Master Plan and public connection <br />to Langton Lake Park. Ms. Radel noted that creation of the. TIF District did not <br />obligate the City to provide assistance to the project; however, staff recommends <br />that the City Council not. create the District if it does not support, in concept, <br />some level of financial assistance for the project. <br />Mikaela Huot, Assistance Vice President/Consultant, Springsted, Inc. <br />Ms. Radel distributed a bench handout, attached hereto and made a part thereof, <br />on tonight's presentation and discussion of the proposed TIF (Economic Devel- <br />opment) District No. 19 for Applewood Pointe Senior Cooperative Housing <br />Project. <br />Ms. Huot concurred with staff's comment regarding City Council approval of the <br />plan not committing the City to provide any type of subsidy, but allowing the City <br />flexibility in using TIF. Ms. Huot reviewed the components of the TIF Plan itself <br />based on new legislation allowing the City to use statutory authority on a broader <br />basis for economic development uses within TIF guidelines, specifically for af- <br />fordable housing. Ms. Huot advised that the proposed term of the District was for <br />nine years, encompassed 7.67 acres, with four parcels to be acquired in the Dis- <br />trict. Ms. Huot reviewed the phasing of the project for ninety-four (94) senior co- <br />operative units, in two phases, fifty (50) and forty-four (44) units respectively; <br />and the third phase consisting of ninety-three (93) assisted living units. <br />Ms. Huot reviewed their firm's findings, noting that it did qualify as an Economic <br />Development District, in that the project will create and/or retain jobs in this state, <br />including construction jobs; and that construction would not be commenced be- <br />fore July 1, 2011, with construction to begin no later than July 1, 2011, with the <br />developer's request for certification received no late than June 30, 2011. Ms. <br />Huot reviewed the "BUT FOR" tests in making findings on this proposed District; <br />rti.viewed the budget estimates for public costs, including soils corrections; land <br />acquisition; installation of public utilities; streets and sidewalks; loan interest <br />payments; administrative costs; and other pooled City expenses for total estimated <br />public costs of $2,450,551 for all three phases of the project. Ms. Huot noted that <br />the developer was only seeking TIF financing for a portion of the costs for Phases <br />I and II of the project, but that Springsted was recommending that all phases and <br />parcels be included in the proposed TIF District to allow future flexibility without <br />amending the District itself should additional funds be requested for Phases II and <br />III. Ms. Huot noted that the term of the District could be reduced before the nine <br />year projection, allowing the use of TIF for other phases; but further noted that <br />the four-year rule applied, and if there was no activity on a parcel after four years, <br />it would be removed from the District. <br />