My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0920
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0920
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2010 11:49:53 AM
Creation date
10/5/2010 11:49:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/20/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 20, 2010 <br />Page 7 <br />hensive Plan Update process; and to Rezone the same 70 properties accordingly; <br />as detailed in the RCA dated September 20, 2010. <br />Staff recommended that the City Council approve Comprehensive Plan -Land <br />Use Amendments for 68 anomaly properties as indicated on the slides presented <br />as part of the RCA; with the rezoning of each parcel appearing on a revised Offi- <br />cial Zoning Map to be brought forward to the City Council for their final approval <br />in October or November of this year. Mr. Paschke noted the removal of two <br />properties identified on the map (page 34) that would remain Institutional rather <br />than amended to Low Density Residential at this time; as well as a vacant, city- <br />owned parcel at 2668 Lexington Avenue (Map -page 41) that will remain High <br />Density Residential rather than re-designated Right-of--Way. Mr. Paschke further <br />referenced a letter from the City Attorney, as well as Mr. Gunnar Pettersen in- <br />cluded in the materials. <br />Discussion included the property on the map (page 5) and how it was split for <br />Neighborhood Business and Residential; and rationale for the property on page 34 <br />remaining Institutional and long-term interest by the School Board in acquiring <br />that foreclosed parcel for development. <br />Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon advised that the parcel <br />would need to be rezoned accordingly; and staff suggesting that the parcel remain <br />single-family residential until the foreclosure and ownership was sorted out; and <br />perhaps return at a future date for amendment if deemed advisable. <br />City Attorney Caroline Bell-Beckman concurred with staffls suggestion. <br />Councilmember Pust requested clarification on the zoning in the previous Com- <br />prehensive Plan; and staff researched that zoning. Councilmember Pust opined <br />that the possible purchase of the property by the School District should not be <br />used as criteria. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her concern that properties (pages 48-59) pre- <br />viously guided as Park/Open Space (POS) are proposed to be changed to Low <br />Density Residential (LDR) with few exceptions. Councilmember Ihlan specifi- <br />cally noted those properties around Langton Lake and questioned existing Master <br />Plan or future Master Plans contemplating those parcels being potentially a part of <br />Langton Park. <br />Parks and Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke advised that the parcels around <br />Langton Lake have been included in previous Park master Plans and consistent <br />with previous Comprehensive Plans; and remained identified in the current Mas- <br />ter Plan as potential acquisitions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.