My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0108_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0108_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 4:09:52 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:27:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. This type of process is more proactive and visionary and provides for a more <br />comprehensive master plan. In addition, the process removes a <br />redevelopment barrier by decreasing the environmental review process for <br />projects by six months to a year. This savings is time can be very significant <br />in the site selection process for major corporations. Once the AUAR is <br />complete, the community, developers and companies will have a better <br />understanding of what is expected in the redevelopment process. <br />3.7 RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends using the quality of life <br />guidelines to assist in the land use decision making: <br />1. Heavy industry, truck terminals and semi trailer storage are not the most <br />compatible land use fit for the future of Twin Lakes because of traffic <br />demands, noise, water and air quality problems, and low building quality. The <br />Plan should continue to discourage further trucking related intrusions into the <br />Twin Lakes area, and further, discourage new heavy industrial plant <br />establishments, intensifications, or expansions. <br />2. New housing (or a mix of housing and offices in the same building) should be <br />located adjacent to existing housing, lakes and parks areas wherever possible. <br />By adding a professional or home office component to the housing structure, <br />a higher building value is created which can help reduce the initial cost of the <br />housing units. An alternate to housing is high quality office or headquarters <br />building. <br />3. Service mixes of support lodging, retail, banks, fitness and similar uses should <br />be located nearest to County Road C and Cleveland Avenue to take advantage <br />of good marketability and easy access onto a busy street system — it is both a <br />subregional destination for travelers, and a support service for users within the <br />business park. Business park users could reduce trips and need not gain access <br />from the busy streets but rather from internal roads and sidewalks. In <br />addition, these are the best areas for existing and expanded transit stops for <br />the workers of those service industries. <br />4. Multiple level offices and medical offices should take visual and access <br />advantage of locations along the Parkway and Cleveland Avenue. Offices <br />could be a good neighbor to residential land because of their lower noise, <br />light, and traffic complexities in the evenings. In addition, the design and <br />configuration of office complexes could be an advantage to the neighborhood <br />where public pathways, water features and green spaces may be created for <br />public use. <br />5. Office, High Tech/Flex, and light assembly (all storage inside building) uses <br />can fit most everywhere but fit best on some of the lower visibility parcels <br />where employees are the primary traffic. This type of use can also be a buffer <br />between the existing retail and other more sensitive uses. <br />PF3232 — RCA(010801) Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.