My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0122_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0122_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:04:57 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission and Council review the PUD amendment again when the EAW and <br />comment is complete, prior to the City Council decision on the EAW. <br />5.3 In late March, the City Council would then review additional Planning Commission <br />recommendations; receive comment on the EAW and decide on the Council's declaration of <br />EAW adequacy and impact. Assuming there are no additional significant environmental <br />impacts, the Council could then also approve the amendment to the Final Planned Unit <br />Development documents. <br />6.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />6.1 The Planning Commission after a hearing on 7anuary 10,200 1, recommended that the proposed <br />land use (business office) was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Centre Pointe <br />PUD intent. They recommended that the Voluntary EAW be completed based on the proposed <br />uses. The Commission agreed to review the EAW and comments at their March 14, 2001 <br />meehng. <br />7.0 SUGGESTED COUNCII, ACTION <br />7.1 By motion, the Council finds the land uses proposed within the Veritas amendment (122,000 s.f. <br />of additional office space) to the e�sting Planned Unit Development to be consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan and the intent of the 1997 Centre Pointe PUD and approves the distribution <br />of the Voluntary EAW for review, with notice to be published concerning its availability. <br />8.0 FUTURE STEPS: <br />On 7anuary 22,200 1, assuming that the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission, <br />the Council must then approve the distribution of the Voluntary EAW for review. After the 30 <br />to 45 day period in which state, county, local agencies and the public review is completed, and <br />subsequent Planning Commission comments added, the Council must then determine whether <br />there are any significant new environmental impacts. If there are no significant impacts, the <br />Council action may be to provide a"negative declaration" — which means there are no <br />significant impacts that would require further environmental analysis and additional mitigation <br />than what is proposed. <br />Report by: Thomas Paschke (65 1-490-2236); Dennis Welsch (65 1-490-2232) <br />Attachments: Partial EAW; Site Plans <br />60-Day Time Limit: Not applicable. <br />Q:�Plaz�ning Files\3283_Veritas\RCA (012201).doc <br />PF 3283 — RCA (O1/22/O1) — Page 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.