Laserfiche WebLink
D RAFT <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 3280 <br />A Resolution Recommending Approval of Variances for Peter Vesterholt for the <br />Construction of a Garage Addition onto to the Existing Home at 699 Heinel Circle. <br />WHEREAS, Peter Vesterholt, property owner of 699 Heinel Circle, has requested variance� <br />from Section 1���.02�5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard and <br />Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts), 1016.16A (Structure Design Standards), 1016.22A1 (Non- <br />Conformities) of the Roseville City Code; and <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, <br />Frontage, Yard and Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts) requires a front yard setback of 30 feet <br />for the Vesterholt property adjacent to Heinel Circle; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Vesterholt wants to eliminate an existing (unsightly) shed and construct an <br />addition onto his existing garage to improve handicapped accessibility for his wife. The existing <br />garage, 19 feet wide by 21 feet deep (399 square feet) lies appro�nately 15 feet from the front yard <br />(east) property line. The proposal would place the garage approximately 7 feet from the front <br />property line. This front yard setback variance also requires a variance from Section 602 allowing <br />vehicles to be parked within street right-of-way. <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, <br />Frontage, Yard and Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts) also requires a side yard setback of 10 <br />feet far the Vesterholt property along the northeast property line; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Vesterholt proposes to eatend the garage towards the northeastern side yard <br />property line to create an additional stall and enclosed storage area. The design and additional area <br />will offer accessibility to stored items and greater movement around vehicles. However, the <br />proposed addition would encroach five feet into the required lo-foot side yard setback; and <br />WHEREAS, Section 1016.22A1 (Non-Conformities) stipulates that non-confarmities can <br />continue but are subject to applicable State Statutes and City Ordinance regarding alterations, repair <br />after damage, discontinuance of u8e, and intensif'ication of use; and <br />WHEREAS, The Vesterholt house has been determined to be a pre-existing non- <br />confarming structure that was constructed priar to the City adopting Shoreland, Wetland, and Storm <br />Water Management regulations. The specif'ic non-conformity is the distance the principal structure <br />is setback (56 feet) from the Ordinary High Watermark. A variance is necessary to bring the house <br />into conformity with the City Code, which requires a 75-foot setback from the OHW; and <br />WHEREAS, Section 1016.16 (Structure Design Standards) requires structures to be set back <br />a minimum of 75 feet from the ordinary high watermark (OHW�; and <br />