My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0122_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0122_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:04:57 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />Extract of 1�Tinutes from Planning Commission meetin� of Jalluat'V 10, 2001: <br />e. Plannin� File 3280: A request by Peter Vesterholt, 699 Heinel Circle, for a 5 <br />and 23 foot variance from Section 1004.02D (Minimum Yard Requirements) of <br />the Roseville Zoning Ordinance to allow construction of an attached garage into <br />the required side and front yard (street side) setback. <br />Chairman Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested City Planner Thomas <br />Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the project report dated January 10,200 1. <br />Thomas Paschke provided a description of the garage expansion project. He explained <br />the 10' setback requirements and the MnDNR support for granting the variance. <br />The applicant did not create the hardship; the use is pre-existing; the garage adds <br />livability and accessibility; the setback is similar to other setbacks in the area. Platted in <br />1949, the lot is non-conforming with the house so close to the front property line (15 <br />feet). The street was reconstructed and moved further from the house lea�ing a large <br />right-of-way boulevard. City Code Section 602 requires parking on private property, not <br />in boulevards without a variance or permit. Staff recommended approval with conditions <br />A through E of the project report dated January 10, Z001. <br />Mr. Vesterholt explained the expansion and the benefit of removing the front storage <br />shed. <br />No further public comment was offered; the public hearing was closed. <br />Motion: Member Klausing moved, second by Member Rhody, to recommend approval <br />of Resolution #3280 with amendment to add Section 602 and conditions A through E of <br />said Resolution (an executed copy of which is attached). <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.