2001_0122_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

DRAFT EXTRACT OF MIl�IUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due ca11 and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 22°d day of January 2001, at 6:30 p.m. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN A1�TENDI�TENT TO THE COI�TPREHENSIVE PLAN 1�TAP DESIGNATION FRO1�T HD, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO B, BUSINESS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2330 LEkINGTON AVENUE (PF #3277). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a public hearing held on 7anuaty 10, 2001, received a request from McKinley Companies, Inc., for General Concept and Fina1 Development Plan consideration of a Business Planned Unit Development (B-PUD) to redevelop the half acre parcel located at 2330 Le�ngton Avenue into a five unit attached office condominium; and WHEREAS, the proposal requires a Comprehensive Plan Map Designation Amendment from HD, High Density Residential to B, Business and a rezoning (change in the zoning map designation) from R- 1, Single Family Residential District to B-PUD, Business Planned Unit Development with an underlying zoning of B-1, Limited Business District; and WHEREAS, said properiy is legally described as: Lot 4, Block 1, Rose of Sharon 2°d Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota (PID # 12923320050). WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission recommended approval, by the City Council, of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, based on findings as outlined in the staff report dated 7anuary 12, 2000, as follows: The future land use for this parcel, as identified in Roseville's Comprehensive Plan, indicates that this parcel should develop as High Density Residential (HD). Currently the lot is vacant, and over the past two years the Community Development staff has discussed the sites potential for townhouse development with interested individuals. However, none of these discussions ha�e ever been submitted for review. 2. Two hea�ily tra�eled roadways, State Trunk Highway 36 and Le�ngton Avenue, lie adjacent to the parcel. Each roadway has a high volume of traffic that produces a level of noise that is difficult to screen or block and peak hour traffic volumes that become cumbersome to negotiate given the limited site access to Le�ngton Avenue from Lovell Lane.